Two-step production of anti-inflammatory soluble factor by Lactobacillus reuteri CRL 1098

Abstract

We have demonstrated previously that a soluble factor (LrS) produced by Lactobacillus (L.) reuteri CRL 1098 modulates the inflammatory response triggered by lipopolysaccharide. In this study, the production of LrS by L. reuteri CRL 1098 was realized through two steps: i) bacterial biomass production, ii) LrS production, where the bacterial biomass was able to live but did not proliferate. Therefore, the simultaneous evaluation of the effect of different factors on the growth and LrS production was performed. Biomass production was found to be dependent mainly on culture medium, while LrS production with anti-inflammatory activity depended on culture conditions of the biomass such as pH, agitation and growth phase. The L. reuteri CRL 1098 biomass and LrS production in the optimized culture media designed for this work reduced the complete process cost by approximately 95%, respectively to laboratory scale cost.

Introduction

In the past decades, several worksdemonstrated the capacity of probiotic lactic acid bacteria (LAB) to modulate immune response. In this way, some strains may have prophylactic and therapeutic effect in different complex disorders, including inflammatory diseases [14]. In addition, increased research reports revealed that certain surface-associated and extracellular components produced by probiotic bacteria could be responsible for some of their beneficial effects: they include exopolysaccharides, bacteriocins, surface-associated and extracellular proteins and peptides and lipoteichoic acid [59].

The current demand for new products enriched with probiotics or its functional extracellular componentsrequires new economic media for their production at an industrial scale [10]. In probiotic product development processes, microbial biomass and bioactive metabolites areconsidered raw material. Thus, the cost of the culture media for the industrial production of both is a determinant factor [11]. To produce significant biomass, Lactobacilli have complex nutrient requirementssuch as amino acids, yeast extract, carbohydrates, vitamins and minerals [12]. However, the use of these nutrient supplements in large quantities is very expensive [13]. Therefore, a development of new culture media taking into account nutrient requirements and growth parameters could lead to a more economical probiotic production [14]. Statistical methodology is efficiently used to optimize several bioprocesses such as the development of a simplified, and hence more economical, culture medium, for biomass production [1415]. In this situation, the fractional factorial designs have been successfully applied for studying the effects and interactions of distinct nutrients on Lactobacillus growth [1517].

We have demonstrated previously, that L. reuteri CRL1098 can produce a supernatant (LrS) able to reduce the TNF-α production by human peripheral blood mononuclear cells (PBMC) [18]. Bearing in mind that TNF-α levels reduction is an effective treatment for inflammatory diseases, we further investigated whether LrS was able to modulate the inflammatory response used different models. For this, we used in vitro and in vivo models. Results showed that LrS exerted anti-inflammatory actions in LPS-challenged murine macrophages model and in acute lung injury induced by LPS in mice [19]. The compound present in LrS, responsible for the anti-inflammatory actions, is a peptide moiety component. Using RP-HPLC, this peptide was isolated keeping of the capacity to reduce the TNF-α production by PBMC. The peptide was identified by mass spectrometry as 5785 Da [18], and its sequence analysis is currently in progress.

At laboratory scale, the production of LrS involves two steps: production of L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass until the early exponential growth phase in MRS broth [20], and then the transfer of the obtained biomass to RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA) with incubation of 4 h, where the bacteria are able tolive but do not proliferate and produce LrS (Fig 1). Some preliminary assays revealed that the compound is not associated with the growth of L. reuteri and the extension of the incubation time in the second step does not increase the anti-inflammatory activity of LrS (unpublished data).

The cost analysis of LrS production process reveals that MRS and RPMI 1640 media are very expensive and they significantly increase the cost of production (LrS: 138.3 USD/L). Therefore, the aims of this study were to formulate low-cost media for (i) L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass production (first step) using a fractional factorial design and (ii) LrS production (second step). Fermentation parameters such as pH, culture agitation and bacterial growth phase were also determined.

Materials and methods

Bacterial growth

L. reuteri CRL1098, an anti-inflammatory soluble factor producing strain, was provided by the Culture Collection of Centro de Referencia para Lactobacilos, CERELA. Tucumán, Argentina. Stock cultures were maintained at −20 °C in 10% reconstituted skim milk supplemented with 0.5% yeast extract, 1.0% glucose, and 10.0% glycerol (w/v). Prior to experimental use, cultures were propagated (1%, v/v) in MRS medium containing per liter: 10 g meat peptone, 10 g meat extract, 5 g yeast extract, 3 g sodium acetate, 2 g K2HPO4, 2 g ammonium citrate, 20 g glucose, 1 mL Tween 80, 0.2 g MgSO4.7H2O and 0.038 g MnSO4.H2O, final pH 6.5 [20], and incubated at 37 °C for 18h without agitation.

First step: Design of a low-cost culture medium for L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass production

The 210−6 fractional factorial design was used to select significant culture medium components affecting the L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass production. Design Expert version 7.0 statistical software (Stat-Ease, Minneapolis, MN) was used for the experimental design and regression analysis of the experimental data. The MRS culture medium was used as the base culture medium for the growth of L. reuteri. The factors and levels taken into consideration were: meat peptone (0.0, 0.5 and 1.0%), meat extract (0.0, 0.5 and 1.0%), yeast extract (0.0, 0.25 and 0.5%), sodium acetate (0.0, 0.15 and 0.3%), K2HPO4 (0.0, 0.1 and 0.2%), ammonium citrate (0.0, 0.1 and 0.2%), glucose (0.5, 1.25 and 2.0%), Tween 80 (0.0, 0.05 and 0.1%), MgSO4.7H2O (0.0, 0.01 and 0.02%), MnSO4.H2O (0.0, 0.0019 and 0.0038%). A 210−6 fractional factorial design was utilized to screen 38 different culture media defined in 2 blocks with three central points in each block (Table 1). The batch fermentations were carried out in 100 mLPyrex bottles containing 80 mL of fermentation medium. The different culture media were inoculated (2% v/v) with L. reuteri CRL1098 and incubated at 37°C for 3h (exponential growth phase) without agitation. The responses evaluated were LAB growth and pH changes (pHmeter PT-10 model, Sartorius AG, Goettingen, Germany). Cell viability was determined by plating appropriate dilutions of the cultures in MRS agar (MRS Britania, Buenos Aires, Argentina, plus 15 g/L agar). Plates were incubated at 37°C for 48h and the colony-forming units (CFU/mL) were determined.

Later, we evaluated the growth of L. reuteri CRL1098 in an optimized culture medium. In addition, the effect of agitation and the ability of this biomass to produce LrS in RPMI 1640 medium were also determined. The batch fermentation experiments were carried out in formulated culture medium (named PETG medium: 0.5% meat peptone, 0.5% meat extract, 0.1% Tween 80 and 0.5% glucose). L. reuteri CRL1098 was inoculated (2% v/v) in 100 mL (Pyrex bottles 100 mL) and incubated at 37°C with and without agitation (rotary shaker at 150 rpm, Marconi, Piracicaba, Brazil)for 3h. Batch culture experiments were performed under uncontrolled pH. Both cultures were centrifuged (8,000 g for 10 min), washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and resuspended (7.5 LogCFU/mL) in RPMI 1640 medium (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA). These bacterial suspensions were incubated for 4h at 37°C in agitating conditions (rotary shaker at 150 rpm). After, the suspensions were centrifuged and LrS was obtained by aseptic filtration using 0.22 mm pore size low protein binding cellulose acetate filters (Millipore, Bedford, MA, USA). LrS was frozen at -20°C for further experiments. The anti-inflammatory activity of LrS was determined as described below.

On an industrial scale, the lactic cultures are produced in bioreactors and harvested in stationary phase when the maximum biomass production is reached. Therefore, the L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass production in bioreactors and the obtaining of LrS in RPMI 1640 medium were evaluated. To accomplish this, batch fermentations were performed in a 2 L bioreactor (INFORS HT, Switzerland). The PETG medium (1.5 L, pH 6.5) was added to the bioreactor and inoculated with L. reuteri CRL 1098 cultures (2%, v/v). During 24h fermentation, the temperature was maintained at 37 °C, the agitation speed at 150 rpm. Batch cultures experiments were performed under controlled and uncontrolled pH. When the controlled pH experiment was conducted, pH was maintained at 5.5 by adding 2 M NaOH (pH value used to produce biomass of Lactobacillus in our laboratory). Samples were withdrawn periodically to determine cell growth (Log CFU/mL), acidification (pH) and glucose consumption. pH measurements were determined with a digital pH meter (Altronix TPX 1, New York, USA).

In order to evaluate the effect of growth stages on the ability of the microorganism to produce LrS, the fermentation time in bioreactors was extended until to 24h. Cells obtained from free and controlled pH cultures in different growth stages were centrifuged (8,000 g for 10 min), washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS), resuspended (7.5 Log CFU/mL) in RPMI 1640 medium and incubated for 4h at 37°C in agitating conditions (rotary shaker at 150 rpm). The bacterial suspension was centrifuged and LrS was aseptically filtered. The anti-inflammatory activity of LrS was determined as described below.

Second step: Formulation of a low-cost medium for anti-inflammatory LrS production

In the second step, L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass is resuspended in RPMI 1640 medium and incubated for 4h (Fig 1). Under these experimental conditions, the microorganism was capable of living but did not proliferate. In order to reduce the cost of RPMI medium, different media and buffer solutions were tested.

The batch fermentation experiments were carried out in PETG medium with agitation (150rpm), under uncontrolled pH condition during 6 h at 37°C (optimized conditions to biomass production in previous point). Culture were centrifuged (8,000 g for 10 min), washed with phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) and, resuspended in the following media and solutions: RPMI 1640 medium (control), DMEM medium (GIBCO, Grand Island, NY, USA), BactoCasitone medium (BD Biosciences. Becton, Dickinson and Company. CA, USA), phosphate buffer saline (PBS), tris-(hydroxymethyl)-aminomethane (Tris buffer) and sodium citrate buffer with and without glucose. All these media and solutions were later assayed. The bacterial suspensions were incubated for 4h at 37°C in agitating conditions (rotary shaker at 150 rpm); then they were centrifuged and aseptically filtered to obtain LrS. The anti-inflammatory activity of LrS was determined as described below.

Anti-inflammatory activity of LrS

To study the anti-inflammatory activity of LrS, mouse macrophage cell line RAW 264.7 was cultured in DMEM supplemented with 10% fetal bovine serum (FBS) (NATOCOR, Córdoba, Argentina), 100 IU/mL penicillin and 100 mg/mL streptomycin and cultured at 37°C in a 5% CO2 incubator. Prior to the addition of LrS, cells were seeded in 24-well culture plates, lowed to adhere for 8h at 37 °C in 5% CO2 atmosphere. Once LrS was added, the cells were incubated for 4h. Finally, LPS (100 ng/mL final concentration) from Escherichia (E.) coli serotype O26: B6 (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) was added to cultures and incubated for 20 h. Different anti-inflammatory parameters were determined. Nitric oxide (NO) concentrations in supernatants of RAW 264.7 cells were determined by using Griess reagent (Promega Corporation, Madison, WI, USA). 50 mL aliquots of medium were mixed with an equal volume of sulfanilamide solution (1% sulfanilamide in 5% phosphoric acid) at different times and left to stand for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. Then, 50 mL of NED solution [0.1% N-(1-Naphthyl) ethylenediamine] were added and left to stand for 10 min at room temperature in the dark. The absorbance was measured at 540nm with a microplate reader (VERSAmax, Molecular devices, Sunnyvale, CA, USA). Standard curve for sodium nitrite was used to acquire the level of NO produced by treated RAW 264.7 cells.

TNF-α concentration was measured in cell free supernatants of RAW 264.7 cells using enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay kits (ELISA Ready-Set- Go!eBioscience, San Diego, CA, USA).

Statistical data analysis

All assays were performed at least in triplicate and the results were expressed as mean values with standard deviations. Statistical analyses were performed using MINITAB 14 software (State College, PA, USA). Comparisons were accomplished by ANOVA general linear model followed by Fisher test. Statistically significant differences were defined at a p value <0.05.

Results

First step: Design of a low-cost culture medium for L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass production and evaluation of their functional property

The first step on the search for optimal conditions for biomass production was to identify the variables with significant influence. The statistical design resulted into 38 culture media defined in 2 blocks with three central points in each block (Table 1). Table 1 summarizes L. reuteri CRL1098 growth (Log CFU/mL), ΔpH (pHinitial−pHfinal) and the cost of each medium assayed. In most culture medium, the bacterial growth reached approximately 7.4–7.9Log CFU/mL and significant changes in pH were detected (ΔpH 0.47 to 0.75). Remarkably, the higher acidification was detected (ΔpH 1.62) in medium number 4; however, a low growth (7.13 Log CFU/mL) was observed. The cost of each one of the media evaluated was different, varying from 0.59 to 9.27 USD/L.

Three components of the culture medium; meat peptone, meat extract and Tween 80, showed a positive effect on bacterial growth (Table 2). In addition, using this statistical design, interaction effects among factors on the biomass production evidenced positive and negative interactions (S1 Fig). The most important positive interaction occurred among meat peptone and meat extract: an increase of meat peptone and meat extract concentration (from 0 to 1%) improved L. reuteri growth. However, the intermediate value (0.5%) showed a similar growth to the maximum concentration (1%). On the other hand, a positive effect of Tween 80 was observed with the highest concentration (0.1%).

According to significant effect and interactions, the composition of the culture medium, named PETGculture medium, was: an intermediate concentration (0.5%) of meat peptone and meat extract, and a high concentration (0.1%) of Tween 80. Glucose was added at a minimal concentration (0.5%) as a carbon source. To validate this medium, L. reuteri CRL1098 was cultured both in MRS and PETG culture media for 3 h without agitation. L. reuteri CRL1098 growth in PETG culture medium, was similar to that observed in MRS medium (7.9 ± 0.02 Log CFU/mL), Thus, PETG culture medium could replace MRS medium and its cost was only 3.81 USD/L compared with 9.27 USD/L of MRS medium (Fig 1).

The culture conditions could affect the biomass yield as well as the functional properties of Lactobacillus. Consequently, the current study evaluated different factors, such as culture medium, agitation, pH and growth phases on biomass production and anti-inflammatory activity of LrS obtained in RPMI 1640 medium. First, the effect of agitation on biomass production was evaluated. Batch experiments were carried out in PETG culture medium with or without agitation for 3h under uncontrolled pH at 37°C. L. reuteri CRL1098 growth was similar in both conditions (7.6 ± 0.2 Log CFU/mL). Subsequently, the production on LrS by bacteria grown in both conditions was evaluated in RPMI 1640 medium, and their anti-inflammatory effect was checked on LPS challenged RAW cells. Stimulation of cells with LPS significantly increased NO production by RAW 264.7 cells (Fig 2). The levels of NO were significantly lower (35%) in LPS-challenged cells treated with LrS produced by L. reuteri grown under stirring conditions. However, this effect was not induced by the LrS produced by the microorganism grown under static conditions: the levels of NO were the same than the ones observed in LPS-challenged cells (Fig 2).

thumbnail

Fig 2. Effect of LrS on NO production by RAW 264.7 macrophages.

LrS production by bacteria grown in under static and stirred conditions was evaluated in RPMI 1640 medium, and their anti-inflammatory effect was checked on LPS challenged RAW cells. NO was measured in culture supernatants by Griess assay. Data are representative result of three independent experiments. Values not sharing the same letter were significantly different (p-value<0.05).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200426.g002

Considering that pH plays a key role in growth, its effect was evaluated in a laboratory bioreactor (1.5 l) with continuous agitation (150 rpm) under controlled and uncontrolled pH for 24 h (Fig 3). The cultures under uncontrolled pH conditions reached stationary growth phase at 7 h incubation (8.0 ± 0.2 Log CFU/mL) (Fig 3). These values were achieved earlier (3h) at controlled pH conditions. However, although pH was controlled, a significantly viability decrease was observed after 6h of fermentation (Fig 3), probably because glucose was rapidly and almost completely consumed: from 5.0 to 0.9 g/L at 6h, and only 0.27 g/L of glucose was detected at 24h.

On an industrial scale, the lactic cultures are harvested in stationary phase when the maximum biomass production is reached. However, previous studies in our laboratory demonstrated that L. reuteri CRL 1098 in exponential growth phase (MRS medium, uncontrolled pH) was able to produce active LrS (reduction TNF-α production in PBMC) [18] (Fig 1). With this approach, the ability of bacterial cells at different phases of growth, obtained from controlled and uncontrolled pH cultures (early exponential, late exponential and stationary phases) to produce anti-inflammatory LrS in RPMI 1640 medium was evaluated. At uncontrolled pH, the anti-inflammatory activity of LrS obtained from both growth phase, early and late exponential was similar (Fig 4). On the contrary, different results were observed in controlled pH cultures, in which the anti-inflammatory capacity of LrS depended on the growth phase of the microorganism. The anti-inflammatory activity was only observed in LrS obtained from biomass in late exponential phase. Regardless the pH conditions of the cultures, the LrS obtained from the biomass at the stationary phase showed a high cytotoxicity on RAW 264.7 cells (data not shown).

thumbnail

Fig 4. Effect of LrS obtained in RPMI medium on NO production by RAW 264.7 macrophages.

RAW 264.7 cells were challenged with LPS and LrS obtained from bacteria grow in PETG medium in early and late exponential phase, at controlled and uncontrolled pH conditions. Cells with a without LPS challenge were used as control. NO production was measured in culture supernatants by Griess assay. Data shown are a representative result of three independent experiments. Values not sharing the same letter were significantly different (p-value<0.05).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200426.g004

When the production of TNF-α was evaluated as a marker of inflammation, it was observed that the LrS obtained from uncontrolled pH cultures in both early and late exponential phases, showed a significant decrease (p ≤ 0.05) of this marker (50 and 38%, respectively) regarding the control of cells stimulated with LPS (Fig 5).

thumbnail

Fig 5. Effect of LrS on TNF-α production by RAW 264.7 cells.

LrS production by bacteria grow in PETG medium in early and late exponential growth phase was evaluated in RPMI 1640 medium, and their anti-inflammatory effect was checked on LPS challenged RAW cells. TNF-α production was measured in culture supernatants by ELISA. Data shown are a representative result of three independent experiments. Values not sharing the same letter were significantly different (p-value<0.05).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200426.g005

The quantification of the two inflammatory markers (NO and TNF-α) allowed us to optimize the first stepof biomass production (Fig 1) establishing the conditions of L. reuteri CRL1098 culture: PETG medium, uncontrolled pH, agitation (150 rpm), 37°C and harvest of the biomass in late exponential growth phase (6h of incubation).

Second step: Formulation of a low-cost medium for anti-inflammatory LrS production

In a second step, we aimed to formulate a low cost medium for LrS production. Previously, LrS was obtained after 4h incubation time of L. reuteri CRL1098 in RPMI 1640 medium(129 USD/L) in our laboratory (Fig 1). In these conditions, the microorganism was able live but did not proliferate.

Considering the results of the previous point, L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass was obtained from PETG culture medium in optimized conditions. Subsequently, this biomass was suspended in different media and buffers. Bacteria survival assay in different media and buffers was performed during 4h at 37 °C under agitated condition. Results indicated that L. reuteri CRL1098 only lived, but with a non-proliferating condition in casitone medium (1%) and sodium citrate buffer with 4 g/L glucose as carbon source (Table 3).

To evaluate anti-inflammatory activity of LrS obtained from casitone medium and citrate buffer, LPS stimulates RAW 264.7 cells were treated with both LrS. TNF-α production was determined in culture supernatant (Fig 6). Both LrS diminished TNF-α: 72% diminution induced by LrS obtained in casitone medium and 61% by LrS obtained in citrate buffer.

thumbnail

Fig 6. Effect of LrS on TNF-α production by RAW 264.7 macrophages.

LrS production by bacteria grow in PETG medium (late exponential growth phase, pH-uncontrolled culture) was evaluated in casitone medium and sodium citrate buffer, and their anti-inflammatory effect was checked on LPS challenged RAW cells. TNF-α production was measured in culture supernatants. Data shown are a representative result of three independent experiments. Values not sharing the same letter were significantly different (p-value<0.05).


https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200426.g006

Casitone medium (4.39 USD/L) is hydrolyzed casein composed of a large percentage of peptides that could interfere in the determination of anti-inflammatory activity. For these reasons, citrate buffer was selected as the optimal means for producing the anti-inflammatory compound. It is a simple and economical buffer (2.37 USD/L) that allows the obtention of an acceptable level of anti-inflammatory activity.

Discussion

Research reports revealed that certain extracellular peptides produced by probiotic bacteria are responsible for some of their beneficial effects [2122]. In these works, culture supernatant containing the functional peptides is used, not the purified peptides, despite the fact that its amino acid sequence is available [2125]. In addition, it has been found that the effect of culture supernatant or purified peptides is similar. Thus, this point would be of great industrial importance since aculture supernatant could be used and whose production is of lower cost than a purified peptide production obtained with the use of heterologous strain to overexpress this peptide. On the other hand, the chemical synthesis of peptides to a large scale has a high-cost [26]. We have demonstrated previously that a LrS produced by L.reuteri CRL1098 modulates the inflammatory response in vitro and in a mice model. In this work, we propose an economic process of LrS realized through two steps: biomass and LrS production.

Regarding the first step, usually the probiotic LAB production involves batch growth in large-scale bioreactors. LAB batch culture has been extensively studied before [2730]. These studies evaluate the application of economic and more competitive culture media for biomass production, because the growth medium is the most expensive factorat an industrial level [31]. Statistical models are often used for simplified media formulation, through the exclusion or reduction of components of the medium [15, 32, 33]. The initial approach involves the use of a statistical model, employing the conventional laboratory medium MRS. MRS broth remains the most widely used culture medium for LABgrowth [34]. However, it is too expensive for industrial applications [15]. In this work, MRS medium is used for biomass production in the first step of the studied process. The experiments were performed with different combinations of ten MRS factors to determine their impact on biomass production by using a fractional factorial design. The statistical design allowed us to reduce the number of experimental runs, to identify the important factors, and to determine the interaction between factors without losing the information on the main effects and their interactions [35]. Among the ten factors studied, only meat peptone, meat extract and Tween 80 had significant influence on the growth of L. reuteri CRL1098. Therefore, these components were required for optimal biomass production. Several studies have reported the nutrients influence on LAB biomass production, mainly the positive effect of nitrogen sources, such as, peptone and meat extract. Protein hydrolyzates are widely used in LAB growth culture and account for 70% of the total cost of medium [31, 36]. However, different authors reported the strong effect of nitrogen sources on the growth of Lactobacillus strains, such as, L. casei KH-1 [37], L. acidophilus FTCC 0291 [35], L. rhamnosus E/N [33] and L. reuteri [38]. Hebert et al. [39] showed that Tween 80 had different effects on the growth of several LAB: it has stimulated L. delbrueckii subsp. bulgaricus NCFB 2772 and has inhibited L. sake NCFB 2714. On the contrary, this compound was essential for L. curvatus [40] and had a great positive effect on the growth of L. reuteri [39]. Our results showed a positive curve slope indicating a strong effect of Tween 80 on L. reuteri CRL1098 biomass production. According to statistical design (Table 2), many components in MRS medium, such as, sodium acetate, yeast extract, K2HPO4, ammonium citrate, glucose, MgSO4.7H2O and MnSO4.H2O, were considered not to have a significant effect on the biomass production in the assay conditions. Therefore, these components could be removed from the medium without influencing bacterium growth. This was reported by Mataragas et al. [41] for Leuconostoc mesenteroides L124 and L. curvatus L442, having similar results. Our present results showed the predicted optimal components concentration: 0.5% meat peptone, 0.5% meat extract, 0.1% Tween 80 and 0.5% glucose. In view of these optimal components a PETG culture medium was designed, one sustained L. reuteri CRL 1098 growth. In addition, LrS from PETG culture medium showed the anti-inflammatory effect on LPS stimulated RAW 264.7 cells. The analysis of costs indicated that the PETG culture medium price is 3.81 USD/L, 2.4 times lower than MRS medium cost (9.27 USD/L).

In this study, the simultaneous evaluation of the effect of different factors on the growth and LrS production of a Lactobacilus strain was performed. Biomass production was found to depend mainly on culture medium, while LrS production with anti-inflammatory activity depended of culture conditions such as pH, agitation and growth phase. Previous studies showed that fermentation parameters and culture conditions affect the biomass yield as well as the functional properties of Lactobacillus [42, 43]. Aguirre-Ezkauriatza et al. [44] reported that under agitating conditions, higher biomass was acquired as compared to static condition, because agitation enhances microbial growth by improving the distribution of nutrients through the fermentation tank. In our study, we found similar L. reuteri CRL1098 growth under static and agitating conditions. Nevertheless, the best anti-inflammatory response was observed in cell free supernatant obtained from bacterial culture under agitating condition. L. reuteri is considered an oxygen-tolerant anaerobe with fermentative metabolism. The growth condition and the type of metabolism significantly affect the stress responses in LAB. Several studies have demonstrated that conditions which promote aerobic and respiratory growth (agitation) induce stress tolerance in Lactobacillus [45]. So, this growth condition could also have influenced the ability of L. reuteri to produce active LrS (second step, under cell starvation conditions).

Other important parameter for cultivating LAB is the pH of the fermentation [11]. Numerous studies indicate that the medium pH can influence the microorganisms´ growth, affecting cellular functions and metabolic processes [46, 47]. Rault et al. [48] showed that the pH influenced the growth behavior of lactobacilli and the final yield obtained, although substantial differences can be observed, depending on the strain. The control of fermentation pH has also been used to improve metabolite production of LAB [41, 49, 50]. The optimum pH range for the growth of LAB varies from 3.5 to 6.5 [51]. LeBlanc et al. [52]observed a similar bacterial growth of Lactobacillus strains at different pH conditions of the fermentation medium. However, our experiment showed a significant viability decrease after 6h of fermentation under controlled pH; this could be explained by the fast glucose consumption (82% at 6 h).

Probiotic bacteria at an industrial level are commonly harvested during the stationary growth phase to ensure the highest biomass production [53]. In the present work, the LrS obtained from L. reuteri CRL1098 harvested at stationary phase in both controlled and uncontrolled pH conditions showed a high cytotoxicity on RAW 264.7 cells. This could be due to the production of some toxic metabolite during this growth phase. Some works reported that the growth phase during which probiotics are harvested can influence their capability as health-promoting agents [53]. Deepika et al. [54] reported that cell surface properties of L. rhamnosus GG change during the transition from the exponential to the stationary growth phase, affecting the ability of the strain to adhere to epithelial cells. Lactobacillus strains can differentially affect antigen-specific antibody subclasses IgG1 and IgG2a, dependent on the growth phase. According to Maassen et al. [55], this differential antibody response is due to growth phase-dependent differences in bacterial cell wall composition. Proteins secreted by probiotic LAB at early stationary growth phase were reported in other works; however, they are produced in MRS medium [56, 57].

At laboratory scale LrSproduction (second step) was produced only under stress conditions in RPMI 1640 medium, where the bacteria was able to live but did not proliferate [18]. Some preliminary assays revealed that when the LrS production medium (RPMI medium) was modified by increasing glucose or by adding some essential components (adenine, alanine, glutamine or Tween 80), L. reuteri CRL 1098 grew but the supernatant lost the anti-inflammatory effect. These results showed that the compound is not associated with the growth of L. reuteri (unpublished data). Also, the RPMI 1640 medium used in the second step of LrS production is very expensive (129 USD/L). Therefore, the design of an economic and more competitive medium for LrS production represented an important step for its application at an industrial scale. In order tochange the medium for LrS production for industrial uses, we evaluated the effect of economic media and buffer solutions. Up to date, we did not find reports about culture media optimization for LAB peptides production under non-proliferating conditions. In contrast, several studies reported culture media optimization for bacteriocins production by LAB, antimicrobial peptides which synthesis is associated with bacteria growth [15, 5860]. In this work,sodiumcitrate buffer with glucose (2.37 USD/L) was selected for the anti-inflammatory compound production. Moreover, LrS obtained in sodium citrate buffer had an anti-inflammatory activity similar from that obtained in RPMI 1640 medium. Farias and Manca de Nadraet al. [61] reported that Oenococcus oeni showed extracellular proteolytic activity with exoprotease production when subjected to a total energy and nutrient starvation regime (2 h of incubation in citrate buffer). The production of metabolites by starved bacterial suggests that it could be an effective mechanism for survival in the stress conditions encountered during starvation.

Conclusions

Based on the studies presented in this work, the two-step production of the anti-inflammatory compound by L. reuteri CRL1098 was optimized. Our results suggest that the fermentation procedures are important for the industrial production of probiotics or its active metabolites. The cost analysis reveals the importance of the obtained results: 6.18 USD/L is the cost of producing the LrS with anti-inflammatory activity in the optimized process (PETG culture medium: 3.81 USD/L, citrate buffer: 2.37 USD/L), compared to 138 USD/L price that responds to the original laboratory scale process (Fig 1). In this analysis, only the item supplies (culture media, reagents, drugs) were considered for its impact on the production process, as a starting point for its optimization. The overall results demonstrated that the strategies applied allowed a 95% cost reduction from the original laboratory-scale process.

Supporting information

S1 Fig. Graph of factor interaction as a function of L. reuteri CRL1098 growth.

MP: meat peptone; ME: meat extract; YE: yeast extract; SA: sodium acetate; K: K2HPO4; AC: ammonium citrate; G: glucose; T: Tween 80; Mg: MgSO4.7H2O; Mn: MnSO4.H2O.

https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0200426.s001

(TIF)

Acknowledgments

Authors would like to thank Mrs Elena Bru for her assistance with statistical analysis.

References

  1. 1.
    Ashraf R, Vasiljevic T, Smith SC, Donkor ON. Effect of cell-surface components and metabolites of lactic acid bacteria and probiotic organisms on cytokine production and induction of CD25 expression in human peripheral mononuclear cells. J Dairy Sci. 2014; 9:2542–2558. pmid:24582449
  2. 2.
    Finamore A, Roselli M, Imbinto A, Seeboth J, Oswald IP, Mengheri E. Lactobacillus amylovorus inhibits the TLR4 inflammatory signaling triggered by enterotoxigenic Escherichia coli via modulation of the negative regulators and involvement of TLR2 in intestinal Caco-2 cells and pig explants. Plos One. 2014; 9:e94891. pmid:24733511
  3. 3.
    Inic-Kanada A, Stojanovic M, Marinkovic E, Becker E, Stein E, Lukic I, et al. A probiotic adjuvant Lactobacillus rhamnosus enhances specific immune responses after ocular mucosal immunization with chlamydial polymorphic membrane protein C. Plos One. 2016; 11:e0157875. pmid:27636704
  4. 4.
    Matsusaki T, Takeda S, Takeshita M, Arima Y, Tsend-Ayush C, Oyunsuren T, et al. Augmentation of T helper type 1 immune response through intestinal immunity in murine cutaneous herpes simplex virus type 1 infection by probiotic Lactobacillus plantarum strain 06CC2. Int Immunopharmacol. 2016; 39:320–327. pmid:27517518
  5. 5.
    Qiu X, Zhang M, Yang X, Hong N, Yu C. Faecalibacterium prausnitzii upregulates regulatory T cells and anti-inflammatory cytokines in treating TNBS-induced colitis. J Crohns Colitis. 2013; 7:e558–68. pmid:23643066
  6. 6.
    Hevia A, López P, Suárez A, Jacquot C, Urdaci MC, Margolles A, et al. Association of levels of antibodies from patients with inflammatory bowel disease with extracellular proteins of food and probiotic bacteria. Biomed Res Int. 2014; 351204. pmid:24991549
  7. 7.
    Mariman R, Kremer B, Koning F, Nagelkerken L. The probiotic mixture VSL#3 mediates both pro-and anti-inflammatory responses in bone marrow-derived dendritic cells from C57BL/6and BALB/c mice. Br J Nutr. 2014; 112(7):1088–1097. pmid:25181025
  8. 8.
    Suzuki C, Aoki-Yoshida A, Kimoto-Nira H, Kobayashi M, Sasaki K, Mizumachi K. Effects of Strains of Lactococcus lactis on the production of nitric oxide and cytokines in murine macrophages. Inflammat. 2014; 37:1728–1737. pmid:24818707
  9. 9.
    Quévrain E, Maubert MA, Michon C, Chain F, Marquant R, Tailhades J, et al. Identification of an anti-inflammatory protein from Faecalibacteriumprausnitzii, a commensal bacterium deficient in Crohn’s disease. Gut. 2016; 65:415–425. pmid:26045134
  10. 10.
    Shahravy A, Tabandeh F, Bambai B., Zamanizadeh HR, Mizani M. Optimization of probiotic Lactobacillus casei ATCC 334 production using date powder as carbon source. Chem Ind Chem Eng Q. 2012; 18:273–283.
  11. 11.
    Pancheniak EF, Maziero MT, Rodriguez-León JA, Parada JL, Spier MR, Soccol CR. Molecular characterization and biomass and metabolite production of Lactobacillus reuteri LPB P01-001: A potential probiotic. Braz J Microbiol. 2012; 43:135–147. pmid:24031812
  12. 12.
    Kandler O, Weiss N. Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology. In: Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology, ed by Sneath PA, William and Wilkins Co, Baltimore 1986.
  13. 13.
    Norton S, Lacroix C, Vuillemard JC. Kinetic study of continuous whey permeate fermentation by immobilized Lactobacillus helveticus for lactic acid production. Enzyme Microb Technol. 1994; 16:457–466.
  14. 14.
    Manzoor A, Qazi JI, Haq IU, Mukhtar H, Rasool A. Significantly enhanced biomass production of a novel bio-therapeutic strain Lactobacillus plantarum (AS-14) by developing low cost media cultivation strategy. J Biol Eng. 2017; 5:11–17. pmid:28484513
  15. 15.
    Juarez Tomás MS, Bru E, Wiese B, Nader-Macías ME. Optimization of low-cost culture media for the production of biomass and bacteriocin by a urogenital Lactobacillus salivarius strain. Probiotics Antimicrob Protein. 2010; 2:2–11. pmid:26780896
  16. 16.
    Saha BC. Effect of salt nutrients on mannitol production by Lactobacillus intermedius NRRL B-3693. J Industrial Microbiol Biotechnol. 2006; 33:887–890. pmid:16736171
  17. 17.
    Speranza B, Bevilacqua A, Corbo MR, Sinigaglia M. A possible approach to assess acidification of meat starter cultures: A case study from some wild strains of Lactobacillus plantarum. J Sci Food Agricult. 2017; 97:2961–2968. pmid:27861952
  18. 18.
    Mechoud MA, Mateos MV, de Valdez GF, Villena J, Salvador GA, Rodriguez AV. Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098 soluble factors modulate tumor necrosis factor alpha production in peripheral blood mononuclear cells: involvement of lipid rafts. Int Immunopharmacol. 2012; 14:446–453. pmid:22982041
  19. 19.
    Griet M, Zelaya H, Mateos MV, Salva S, Juarez GE, De Valdez GF, et al.Soluble factors from Lactobacillus reuteri CRL1098 have anti-inflammatory effects in acute lung injury induced by lipopolysaccharide in mice. Plos One. 2014; 9:e110027. pmid:25329163
  20. 20.
    De Man Rogosa JC, Sharpe ME. A medium for the cultivation of Lactobacilli. J Appl Bacteriol. 1960; 23:130–35.
  21. 21.
    Guo S, Guo Y, Ergun A, Lu L. Walker WA, Ganguli K. Secreted Metabolites of Bifidobacterium infantis and Lactobacillus acidophilus. Protect Immature Human Enterocytes from IL-1β-Induced Inflammation: A Transcription Profiling Analysis. PLoS One. 2015; 23:e0124549. pmid:25906317
  22. 22.
    Nanjundaiah YS,Wright D A, Baydoun AR, William T., O’Hare WT, Ali Z, et al. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG conditioned media modulates acute reactive oxygen species and nitric oxide in J774 murine macrophages. Biochem. Biophys. Rep. 2016; 6: 68–75. pmid:28955864
  23. 23.
    Ettinger G, Burton JP, Gloor GB, Reid G. Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Attenuates Induction of Hypertrophy in Cardiomyocytes but Not through Secreted Protein MSP-1 (p75).PLoS One. 2017; 12:e0168622. pmid:28085895
  24. 24.
    Fong LYF, Kirjavainen PV, El-Nezami H. Immunomodulation of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG (LGG)-derived soluble factors on antigen-presenting cells of healthy blood donors. Sci Rep.2016; 6:22845. pmid:26961406
  25. 25.
    Koscik RJE, Reid G, Kim SO, Li W, Challis JRG, Bocking AD. Effect of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GR-1 Supernatant on cytokine and chemokine output from human amnion cells treated with lipoteichoic acid and lipopolysaccharide. Reprod Sci. 2018; 25:239–245. pmid:28587570
  26. 26.
    Guzmán F, Barberis S, Illanes A. Peptide synthesis: chemical or enzymatic. Electron J. Biotechnol. 2007; 10–22.
  27. 27.
    Racine FM, Badal CS. Production of mannitol by Lactobacillus intermedius NRRL B-3693 in fed-batch and continuous cell-recycle fermentations. Process Biochem. 2007; 42:1609–1613.
  28. 28.
    Wee YJ, Ryu HW. Lactic acid production by Lactobacillus sp. RKY2 in a cell-recycle continuous fermentation using lignocellulosic hydrolyzates as inexpensive raw materials. Bioresour Technol. 2009; 100:4262–4270. pmid:19394215
  29. 29.
    Aguirre-Ezkauriatza EJ, Aguilar-Yáñez JM, Ramírez-Medrano A, Alvarez MM. Production of probiotic biomass (Lactobacillus casei) in goat milk whey: comparison of batch, continuous and fed-batch cultures. Bioresource Technol. 2010; 101:2837–2844. pmid:20042330
  30. 30.
    Krzywonos M, Eberhard T. High density process to cultivate Lactobacillus plantarum biomass using wheat stillage and sugar beet molasses. Electronic J Biotechnol. 2011; 14: 1–9.
  31. 31.
    Meli F, Lazzi C, Neviani E, Gatti M. Effect of protein hydrolysates on growth kinetics and aminopeptidase activities of Lactobacillus. Curr Microbiol. 2014; 68:82–87. pmid:23989800
  32. 32.
    Waśko A, Kordowska-Wiater M, Podleśny M, Polak-Berecka M, Targoński Z, Kubik-Komar A. The Plackett-Burman design in optimization of media components for biomass production of Lactobacillus rhamnosus OXY. Acta Biol Hung. 2010; 61:344–355. pmid:20724280
  33. 33.
    Polak-Berecka M, Waśko A, Kordowska-Wiater M, Targoński Z, Kubik-Komar A. Application of response surface methodology to enhancement of biomass production by Lactobacillus rhamnosus E/N. Braz J Microbiol. 2011; 42:1485–1494. pmid:24031782
  34. 34.
    Todorov SD, Dicks LMT. Effect of medium components on bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus plantarum strains ST23LD and ST341LD, isolated from spoiled olive brine. Microbioll Res. 2003; 161:102–108. pmid:16427512
  35. 35.
    Fung WY, Woo YP, Liong MT. Optimization of growth of Lactobacillus acidophilus FTCC 0291 and evaluation of growth characteristics in soy whey medium: a response surface methodology approach. J Agric Food Chem. 2008; 56:7910–7918. pmid:18686970
  36. 36.
    Lazzi C, Meli F, Dossena A, Gatti M, Neviani E. Growth promotion of Bifidobacterium species by poultry bone and meat trimming hydrolyzate. J Food Sci. 2011; 76:392–397. pmid:21623787
  37. 37.
    Ha MY, Kim SW, Lee YW, Kim MJ, Kim SJ. Kinetics analysis of growth and lactic acid production in pH-controlled batch cultures of Lactobacillus casei KH-1 using yeast extract/corn steep liquor/glucose medium. J BiosciBioeng. 2003; 96:134–140.
  38. 38.
    Atilola O, Gyawali R, Aljaloud SO, Ibrahim SA. Use of phytone peptone to optimize growth and cell density of Lactobacillus reuteri. Foods. 2015; 4(3):318–327. pmid:28231207
  39. 39.
    Hebert EM, Raya RR, Savoy de Giori G. Nutritional requirements of Lactobacillus delbrueckii subsp. lactis in a chemically defined medium. Curr Microbiol. 2004; 49:341–345. pmid:15486708
  40. 40.
    Møretrø T, Hagen BF, Axelsson L. A new, completely defined medium for meat Lactobacilli. J Appl Microbiol. 1998; 85:715–722.
  41. 41.
    Mataragas M, Drosinos EH, Tsakalidou E, Metaxopoulos J. Influence of nutrients on growth and bacteriocin production by Leuconostoc mesenteroides L124 and Lactobacillus curvatus L442. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 2004; 85:191–198. pmid:15031648
  42. 42.
    Deepika G, Karunakaran E, Hurley CR, Biggs C, Charalampopoulos D. Influence of fermentation conditions on the surface properties and adhesion of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Microb Cell Fact. 2012; 11:116. pmid:22931558
  43. 43.
    Zhang Y, Son Ng I, Chuanyi Y, Lu Y. Orthogonal array deciphering MRS medium requirements for isolated Lactobacillus rhamnosus ZY with cell properties characterization. J BiosciBioengin. 2014; 118: 298–304. pmid:24721122
  44. 44.
    Aguirre-Ezkauriatza EJ, Galarza-González MG, Uribe-Bujanda AI, Ríos-Licea M, López-Pacheco F, Hernández-Brenes CM, et al. Effect of mixing during fermentation in yogurt manufacturing. J Dairy Sci. 2008; 91:4454–4465. pmid:19038920
  45. 45.
    Pedersen MB, Gaudu P, Lechardeur D, Petit MA, Gruss A. Aerobic respiration metabolism in lactic acid bacteria and uses in biotechnology. Annu Rev Food Sci Technol. 2012; 3:37–58. pmid:22385163
  46. 46.
    Degeest B, Mozzi F, De Vuyst L. Effect of medium composition and temperature and pH changes on exopolysaccharide yields and stability during Streptococcus thermophilus LY03 fermentations. Int J Food Microbiol. 2002; 79: 61–174.
  47. 47.
    Aller K, Adamberg K, Timarova V, Seiman A, Feštšenko D, Vilu R. Nutritional requirements and media development for Lactococcus lactis IL1403. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2014; 98:5871–5881. pmid:24626960
  48. 48.
    Rault A, Bouix M, Beal C. Fermentation pH influences the physiological-state dynamics of Lactobacillus bulgaricus CFL1 during pH-controlled culture. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2009; 75: 4374–4381. pmid:19429565
  49. 49.
    Savoie S, Champagne CP, Chiasson S, Audet P. Media and process parameters affecting the growth, strain ratios and specific acidifying activities of a mixed lactic starter containing aroma-producing and probiotic strains. J Appl Microbiol. 2007; 103:163–174. pmid:17584462
  50. 50.
    Guyot JP, Calderon M, Morlon-Guyot J. Effect of pH control on lactic acid fermentation of starch by Lactobacillus manihotivorans LMG18010T. J Appl Microbiol. 2000; 88(1):176–82. pmid:10735257
  51. 51.
    Russell JB. Resistance of Streptococcus bovis to acetic acid at low ph: relationship between intracellular pH and anion accumulation. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1991; 57: 255–259 pmid:2036013
  52. 52.
    Leblanc JG, Garro MS, Savoy de Giori G. Effect of ph on Lactobacillus fermentum growth, raffinose removal, alpha-galactosidase activity and fermentation products. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2004; 65:119–123. pmid:14727095
  53. 53.
    Laakso K, Koskenniemi K, Koponen J, Kankainen M, Surakka A, Salusjärvi T, et al. Growth phase-associated changes in the proteome and transcriptome of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG in industrial-type whey medium. Microbial Biotechnol. 2011; 4:746–766. pmid:21883975
  54. 54.
    Deepika G, Green RJ, Frazier RA, Charalampopoulos D. Effect of growth time on the surface and adhesion properties of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. J Appl Microbiol. 2009; 107(4):1230–1240. pmid:19486400
  55. 55.
    Maassen CBM, Boersma WJA, Van Holten-Neelen C, Claassen E, Laman JD. Growth phase of orally administered Lactobacillus strains differentially affects igg1/igg2a ratio for soluble antigens: implications for vaccine development. Vaccine. 2003; 21:2751–2757. pmid:12798614
  56. 56.
    Yan F, Cao H, Cover TL, Whitehead R, Washington MK, Polk DB. Soluble proteins produced by probiotic bacteria regulate intestinal epithelial cell survival and growth. Gastroenterol. 2007; 132:562–575. pmid:17258729
  57. 57.
    Sánchez B, Chaignepain S, Schmitter JM, Urdaci MC. A method for the identification of proteins secreted by lactic acid bacteria grown in complex media. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2009; 295:226–229. pmid:19416357
  58. 58.
    Kanmani P, Kumar RS, Yuvaraj N, Paari KA, Pattukumar V, Arul V. Design and optimization of fermentation medium for enhanced bacteriocin production by probiotic bacterium Enterococcus faecium MC13. Prep Biochem Biotechnol. 2010; 41:40–52.
  59. 59.
    Malheiros PS, Sant’Anna V, Todorov SD, Franco BD. Optimization of growth and bacteriocin production by Lactobacillus sakei subsp. sakei 2a. Brazilian J Microbiol. 2015; 46:825–834. pmid:26413066
  60. 60.
    Zhang J, Zhang Y, Liu SN, Han Y, Zhou ZJ. Modelling growth and bacteriocin production by Pediococcus acidilactici PA003 as a function of temperature and pH value. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2012; 166(6):1388–1400. pmid:22246730
  61. 61.
    Farias ME, Manca de Nadra MC. Purification and partial characterization of Oenococcus oeni exoprotease. FEMS Microbiol Lett. 2000; 85:263–266.
Gut Bacteria and IBS
IBS And Gut Bacteria
What is the relationship of stress to IBS
What Is The Relationship Between IBS And Stress
Irritable Bowel Syndrome, Gut Microbiota and Probiotics
Introduction to Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS)
Group of Carbohydrates May Be Hard To Digest
Group of Carbohydrates May Be Hard To Digest
Food Components and Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Food Components and Irritable Bowel Syndrome
How to Follow The Low-FODMAP Diet
How to Follow The Low-FODMAP Diet
Probiotics for IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Probiotics for IBS – Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Yoga for IBS Relief
Yoga for IBS Relief
Famous People With IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Famous People With IBS – Irritable Bowel Syndrome
How To Solve Irritable Bowel Syndrome
How To Solve Irritable Bowel Syndrome
IBS – Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Complementary Health Practices for Irritable Bowel Syndrome Treatment
Valeant to Acquire Specialty Salix Pharma
Valeant to Acquire Specialty Salix Pharma
Food Components and Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Food Components and Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Probiotics for IBS - Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Probiotics for IBS – Irritable Bowel Syndrome
IBD patients are misdiagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome IBS
IBD patients are misdiagnosed with irritable bowel syndrome IBS
Gut Health May Begin in the Mouth
Gut Health May Begin in the Mouth
Probiotics are beneficial bacteria
Probiotics are beneficial bacteria
Breast Milk Studies May Lead to Better Probiotics Baby Formula
Breast Milk Studies May Lead to Better Probiotics Baby Formula
Probiotic Supplements May Contain Unlabeled Traces of Gluten
Some Probiotic Supplements May Contain Unlabeled Traces of Gluten
Comparative genomics of transport proteins in seven Bacteroides species
Dopamine production in Enterococcus faecium: A microbial endocrinology-based mechanism for the selection of probiotics based on neurochemical-producing potential
Impact of Bacillus spp. spores and gentamicin on the gastrointestinal microbiota of suckling and newly weaned piglets
Lactobacillus brevis Strains from Fermented Aloe vera Survive Gastroduodenal Environment and Suppress Common Food Borne Enteropathogens