Fermentation of Propionibacterium acnes, a Commensal Bacterium in the Human Skin Microbiome, as Skin Probiotics against Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus


Bacterial interference creates an ecological competition between commensal and pathogenic bacteria. Through fermentation of milk with gut-friendly bacteria, yogurt is an excellent aid to balance the bacteriological ecosystem in the human intestine. Here, we demonstrate that fermentation of glycerol with Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes), a skin commensal bacterium, can function as a skin probiotic for in vitro and in vivo growth suppression of USA300, the most prevalent community-acquired methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA). We also promote the notion that inappropriate use of antibiotics may eliminate the skin commensals, making it more difficult to fight pathogen infection. This study warrants further investigation to better understand the role of fermentation of skin commensals in infectious disease and the importance of the human skin microbiome in skin health.


Bacterial interference, or bacteriotherapy, in which commensal bacteria are used to prevent colonization of the host by pathogens, has been shown to be a promising modality for prevention and treatment of infections [1], [2]. Yogurts containing live probiotic strains, the best examples of bacterial interference, have been used for centuries to maintain the digestive microbial ecosystem. Bacterial interference via fermentation commonly takes place in natural ecosystems as well. For instance, microorganisms both on and inside fruits metabolize sugars to produce fermentation products including short-chain fatty acids (SCFAs) during ripening. These fermentation products have been found to inhibit activity of bacterial competitors within ripe fruit [3]. Although not identical microenvironments, reports show that SCFAs produced by fermentation of microorganisms have been detected in pus from deep-seated abscesses, anaerobic microenvironments in the context of human bacterial infection [4].

Each individual carries approximately ten times more bacterial cells than human cells [5]. The skin is the human body’s largest organ, colonized by a diverse milieu of microorganisms (skin microbiome), most of which are commensals as they are harmless and even beneficial to their host. Propionibacterium acnes (P. acnes) is a predominant bacterium in skin microbiome [5], [6]. Everyone hosts P. acnes [5], [6] which accounts for approximately half of the total skin microbiome, with an estimated density of 102 to 105–6 cm2[7][9]. Staphylococcus aureus (S. aureus) is a Gram-positive bacterium and one of the major causes of both hospital- and community-acquired infections worldwide. This bacterium is responsible for a broad range of infections such as skin wound and disseminated systemic infections leading to organ failure and death [10]. It is estimated that S. aureus accounts for 12 million outpatient visits and 292,000 hospitalizations of which 126,000 are due to methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA) annually in the United States (US) alone [11]. The Center for Disease Control Prevention (CDC) estimates that more than 90,000 people die from hospital-acquired bacterial infections in US each year [12]. Community-acquired MRSA (CA-MRSA) is reported as the most common cause of purulent skin and soft tissue infections in the US [13]. These infections are particularly difficult to treat because the bacterium has become resistant to many commonly used antibiotics.

Previous studies indicated that P. acnes was found in the human skin wounds [14]. P. acnes and S. aureus were co-isolated from both shoulder sepsis [15] and prosthetic hip infections [15], [16] in adult patients. Although P. acnes predominates on the skin surface and is exposed to atmospheric oxygen, we hypothesize that P. acnes enters the dermis when a deep wound is created by pathogen infection. The anaerobic microenvironment in deep-seated abscesses may trigger P. acnes to undergo fermentation using carbon sources (such as glycerol and glucose) naturally produced in skin. Human hosts exploit P. acnes fermentation in deep-seated abscesses to prevent the entry of S. aureus into the bloodstream and reduce the risk of systemic S. aureus infections.

Propionibacterium acnes was so-named for its ability to ferment carbohydrates to propionic acid, a SCFA known to have antimicrobial activity [17], [18]. Our results demonstrated that P. acnes can fermentatively metabolize glycerol, an endogenous skin metabolite, in mouse skin. The fermentation products of P. acnes significantly suppress the in vitro and in vivo growth of USA300, a CA-MRSA. These results show that fermentation of P. acnes in the human skin microbiome may play a role in human innate immunity against S. aureus. The use of P. acnes fermentation for bacterial interference therapy leverages evolutionary medicine by lowering selective pressure for antibiotic resistance and developing therapeutics with negligible side effect profiles.


P. acnes Fermentation Counteracts USA300

To examine if P. acnes fermentation affects the growth of USA300, P. acnes or Micrococcus luteus (M. luteus), a Gram-positive, non-fermenting skin commensal bacterium, was grown on agar plates in the presence or absence of glycerol, a naturally occurring metabolite found in human skin [19], for three days before growing USA300 in the overlaid agar. As shown in Figure 1A, only P. acnes grown with glycerol showed visible inhibitory effects against USA300. No inhibitory effect was observed when P. acnes was grown in the absence of glycerol (Figure 1C). M. luteus grown with or without glycerol did not display inhibitory effects against the growth of USA300 (Figure 1B and D). These findings suggest that glycerol fermentation is required for inhibitory effect of P. acnes against USA300.


Figure 1. P. acnes interferes with the growth of USA300 in the presence of glycerol.

An overlay assay reveals zones (circles) of inhibition of USA300 growth when P. acnes (ATCC6919, 105 CFU) (A), not M. luteus (B), was grown with USA300 in the presence of glycerol in agar plates under anaerobic conditions at 30°C. No inhibition zones were developed when P. acnes (C) or M. luteus (D) was grown with USA300 in the absence of glycerol.


To test the probiotic effect of P. acnes fermentation products, P. acnes was incubated in rich medium under anaerobic conditions in the presence of glycerol as the carbon source. Rich medium plus glycerol and rich medium plus P. acnes were used as controls. To monitor the fermentation process, cultures were tested with phenol red, a fermentation indicator, to assess SCFA production as a result of glycerol fermentation. Only media in the culture of P. acnes with glycerol turned yellow (more acidic) ten days following incubation (Figure 2A), demonstrating P. acnes fermentation. This was further validated quantitatively by pH values in rich medium containing glycerol, P. acnes and glycerol plus P. acnes of 6.6, 6.5, and 5.6 respectively, following 17 days of incubation. To assess the anti-CA-MRSA activity of P. acnes fermentation products, USA300 [1×105 colony-forming unit (CFU)/ml] was then incubated with each group and their respective serial two-fold dilutions (1/2 to 1/16) overnight. Initial fermented media and its ½ dilution markedly suppressed the growth of USA300 (Figure 2B).


Figure 2. Probiotic effects of P. acnes fermentation against USA300 accompanied by a decrease in intracellular pH.

(A) P. acnes (105 CFU/ml), was incubated in rich medium in the absence (▪) and presence (•) of glycerol under anaerobic conditions for ten days. Rich medium plus glycerol without P. acnes (▴) was included as a control. (B) After a 17-day incubation, fermented or control media were then collected, diluted (1/2 to 1/16) and added to cultures of USA300 (105 CFU/ml) overnight. The inhibitory growth of USA300 was defined as a decline in OD600. (C) The cFSE-loaded USA300 (3×104 CFU) was treated with 100 µl fermented (Medium+glycerol+P. acnes; solid bar) or control [(Medium+glycerol (open bar) and Medium+P. acnes (grey bar)] media. The change in the relative fluorescence units corresponding to intracellular pH of USA300 was measured 5 min after treatment. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 (two-tailed t-tests). Data are the mean ± standard deviation (SD) of three individual experiments. NS: Non-significant.


Ferments of P. acnes Reduce the Intracellular pH of USA300

SCFAs are the principal end products of bacterial fermentation [20]. The antimicrobial effects of SCFAs result mainly from the un-dissociated form of SCFAs [21], [22]. Non-dissociated SCFAs passively diffuse through the cell wall of bacteria. Once internalized into the neutral pH of the cell cytoplasm, they can dissociate into anions and protons. Elevation of both anions and protons is a potentially lethal factor to bacteria that must maintain a near neutral pH cytoplasm to sustain functional macromolecules. Export of excess protons requires consumption of cellular adenosine triphosphate (ATP) and may result in depletion of cellular energy [21]. To determine the action mechanism of fermentation products of P. acnes against CA-MRSA, we loaded USA300 with an internally conjugated fluorescent pH probe, carboxyfluorescein succinimidyl ester (cFSE). Compared to control media, fermented media of P. acnes significantly lowered the intracellular pH of USA300 (Figure 2C), consistent with previous findings that a lowered intracellular pH of bacteria is a lethal mechanism of SCFA [22].

Identification of SCFAs in Fermentation Products of P. acnes by Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Analysis

To identify the SCFAs in bacterial fermentation, P. acnes (ATCC6919) was incubated in rich media under anaerobic conditions in the presence of 13C3-glycerol (20 g/l) for 17 days. The 13C-labeled metabolites in the fermentation products of P. acnes were identified by NMR analysis. In addition to un-metabolized 13C-glycerol (62.3 and 72.5 ppm), three SCFAs (acetic acid, lactic acid, and propionic acid) were detected in the fermentation productions of P. acnes. In a one-dimensional (1-D) 13C NMR spectrum using an NMR spectrometer (400 MHz JEOL JNM-ECS) (Figure S1A), two signals at 21.2 and 69.5 ppm corresponded to 13C-labeled lactic acid. Two 13C-labeled propionic acids appeared at 8.9 and 31.0 ppm. Acetic acid was detected at 24.3 ppm. The signals of acetic acid (1.90 ppm), lactic acid (1.33 and 4.09 ppm), and propionic acid (1.15 and 2.38) in a 1-D 1H NMR spectrum were displayed in Figure S1B. Three major SCFAs including propionic acid in the fermentation products of P. acnes were shown in a two-dimensional (2-D) 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectrum (Figure S1C). Propionibacterium including P. acnes produces propionic acid as the end product of its anaerobic fermentation [23]. Thus, the results above demonstrate that P. acnes fermentatively metabolizes 13C3-glycerol into SCFAs.

Fermentation Products of P. acnes Suppress USA300-infected Lesions and Bacterial Colonization

Although S. aureus can cause a life-threatening and systemic infection (bacteremia), skin and soft tissue are the most common sites of S. aureus infection and comprise more than 75% of MRSA disease [24]. Eradication of infected S. aureus in skin will prevent the bacteria entering the bloodstream. To mimic the natural route of CA-MRSA infection, a 5 mm wound was made on the dorsal skin of Institute of Cancer Research (ICR) mice and USA300 bacteria were topically applied onto the wound. To test the potency of P. acnes fermentation products against CA-MRSA in vivo, we inoculated USA300 (2×106 CFU) to skin wounds 10 min after topical application of P. acnes ferments or controls. Application of fermented media, but not controls, considerably decreased the sizes of USA300-infected skin lesions (Figure 3A and B). To determine the intensity of bacterial colonization, wounds were homogenized to estimate the CFU. The USA300 counts in wounds applied with culture supernatants of medium plus glycerol, medium plus P. acnes or medium plus glycerol and P. acnes were 4.8±0.9×106, 4.9±2.6×106 and 9.4±4.5×105 CFU/g, respectively. These result show that application of fermented media of P. acnes decreased 80% of USA300 colonization in the lesions as compared to application of control media (Figure 3C).


Figure 3. Fermented media of P. acnes and propionic acid suppress the infection of USA300 in mouse skin.

(A) USA300 bacteria (2×106 CFU) were applied onto the wounded areas 10 min after application of culture supernatants of P. acnes in the absence and presence of glycerol or a control (medium plus glycerol). The lesion size was recorded daily for 8 days. (B) Skin lesions pictured on day 1 after bacterial application were illustrated. Bar = 1 cm. (C) Three days after bacterial application, the USA300 numbers in the skin were enumerated and presented as % of control. (D) For MBC assays, USA300 (106 CFU/ml) was incubated with propionic acid (5–100 mM in PBS) in media on a 96-well microplate overnight. Bacteria incubated with PBS alone served as a control. After incubation, USA300 was diluted 1∶10–1∶106 with PBS, and 5 µl of the dilutions were spotted on an agar plate for CFU counts. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 (two-tailed t-tests). Data are the mean ± SD of three individual experiments. UD, undetectable. (E) USA300 bacteria (2×106 CFU) were applied onto the wounded areas 10 min after application of propionic acid (5 µl; 100 mM) or PBS (5 µl). The lesion size was measured daily for 8 days. *P<0.05; **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 (A, E). (F) Three days after bacterial application, the USA300 numbers in the skin were counted and presented as % of PBS control. **P<0.01; ***P<0.001 (C, F). P-values were evaluated using two-tailed t-tests. Data are the mean ± SD of lesions from three separate experiments performed with five mice per group. NS: Non-significant.


To examine if propionic acid exerts antimicrobial activity against CA-MRSA, we determined the minimal bactericidal concentration (MBC) value of propionic acid for USA300. Bacteria were incubated with propionic acid at various concentrations in their media overnight at 37°C. After incubation, the bacteria were diluted with PBS and spotted on an agar plate to count CFU. We found that propionic acid effectively suppressed the growth of USA300 (Figure 3D) at a concentration greater than 25 mM and completely killed all of bacteria at a concentration greater than 100 mM. To assess the antimicrobial activity of propionic acid in vivo, USA300 (2×106 CFU) was inoculated to the wounded areas of ICR mice 10 min following topical application of either propionic acid (100 mM), PBS (pH 7.1) or acidic PBS (pH 3.5, corresponding to pH for 100 mM propionic acid). Application of propionic acid significantly reduced the size of USA300-infected skin lesions as compared to application of both PBS solutions (Figure 3E). On Day 1, the sizes of USA300-infected skin lesions in PBS (pH 7.1)-, acidic PBS (pH 3.5)-, or propionic acid-treated wounds were 4.6±0.6, 4.0±0.8, and 3.2±0.8 mm2, respectively. A significant decrease in the size of USA300-infected skin lesion was detected two days following application of PBS (pH 3.5). Histological observation [hematoxylin and eosin (H&E) staining] revealed that the propionic acid-treated wounds had an attenuated inflammatory response and improved integrity of epidermis and hair follicle compared to PBS-treated wounds (Figure S2). This suggests that propionic acid reduced USA300-induced damage of the epidermal layers and inflammation. To determine the bacterial colonization, USA300-infected skin lesions treated with propionic acid and controls were homogenized to estimate CFU. The bacterial numbers in lesions were: 1.9±1.0×109 (PBS, pH 7.1), 1.7±1.5×109 (PBS, pH 3.5) and 1.4±1.4×107 (propionic acid) CFU/g (Figure 3F), suggesting that propionic acid significantly decreased the growth of USA300 in the skin lesions.

Fermentation of P. acnes Occurs in Mouse Skin

To date, no evidence demonstrates that bacteria can employ the fermentative process to produce SCFAs in vivo. To determine if P. acnes is able to ferment carbon sources in vivo, ear of ICR mice was intradermally injected with 13C3-glycerol (0.2 mg) immediately before injection of P. acnes (ATCC6919; 107 CFU in 10 µl PBS). As a control, the same amount of 13C3-glycerol and PBS was injected to the other ear. One, two and three days after injection, ears were excised, homogenized, and then centrifuged. Supernatants of ear homogenates in 10% deuterium oxide (D2O) were subjected to 1-D 13C NMR analysis. In addition to 13C3-glycerol (62.3 and 72.5 ppm), two strong signals of 13C-labeled metabolites were detected at 17.1 and 58.4 ppm (Figure 4B) in the mice injected with 13C3-glycerol plus P. acnes for three days. These two signals were undetectable in the mice injected with 13C3-glycerol plus P. acnes for one or two day(s) (data not shown). No 13C-labeled metabolites, except 13C3-glycerol, were detected in the mice injected with 13C3-glycerol plus PBS (Figure 4A). These two signals at 17.1 and 58.4 ppm correspond to the chemical groups (-CH3 and -CH2OH) of ethanol. In 1-D 1H NMR analysis, two detected signals at 1.15 and 3.64 ppm validate the production of ethanol (data not shown). To identify the SCFAs in the fermentation products, supernatants of ear homogenates in D2O were subjected to 2-D 13C and 1H NMR analysis. In addition to ethanol, four SCFAs (butyric acid, 3-hydroxy-butyric acid, lactic acid, and propionic acid) were detected in the ear injected with 13C3-glycerol plus P. acnes (Figure 4C). The results demonstrate that P. acnes is able to undergo fermentation in vivo.


Figure 4. NMR validation of fermentation of P. acnes in mouse skin.

(B) The ear of ICR mice was intradermally injected with 13C3-glycerol (0.2 mg) and P. acnes (ATCC6919; 107 CFU in 10 µl PBS) for 3 days. (A) The other ear of the same mouse received 13C3-glycerol (0.2 mg) and PBS (10 µl) as a control. Supernatants of ear homogenates were mixed with 10% D2O and analyzed by a NMR (400 MHz JEOL JNM-ECS) spectrometer. Data from 1,024 scans were accumulated. The NMR signals (17.1 and 58.4 ppm) of 13C-ethanol (Et) metabolized from 13C3-glycerol (Gly) were detected exclusively in the mice injected with 13C3-glycerol and P. acnes. The un-metabolized 13C3-glycerol appears between 60 and 80 ppm in the 13C-NMR spectrum. (C) A 2-D 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectrum (600 MHz) was displayed. In addition to glycerol (Gly), ethanol (Et), four SCFAs [butyric acid (B), 3-hydroxy-butyric acid (3HB), lactic acid (L), and propionic acid (P)] were detected in the ear injected with glycerol and P. acnes.


P. acnes Fermentation in Skin Wounds Diminishes the Colonization of USA300

Although we demonstrated that P. acnes grown with glycerol developed inhibition zones against USA300 in an overlay assay in vitro (Figure 1), it is unclear if P. acnes fermentation in skin wounds can prevent or mitigate a subsequent infection of CA-MRSA. A wound made on the dorsal skin of ICR mice was topically applied with P. acnes (107 CFU in 5 µl PBS) or P. acnes and glycerol (0.2 mg) for three days. USA300 (107 CFU in 5 µl PBS) was subsequently administered onto the same wounds for additional three days. Compared to application of P. acnes alone, application of P. acnes and glycerol showed improved healing of the USA300-infected skin lesions (Figure 5A). In addition, application of P. acnes and glycerol onto the wounds prior to administration of USA300 reduced more than 50% of USA300 colonization in comparison with application of P. acnes alone (Figure 5C). To investigate the effects of glycerol on the USA300 colonization, PBS (5 µl) or glycerol (0.2 mg) was topically applied to skin wounds for three days followed by a 3-day USA300 infection. Compared to PBS, glycerol did not significantly alter the size of USA300-infected lesions (Figure 5B) and USA300 colonization (Figure 5D). These findings indicate that the suppression of USA300 may be due to glycerol fermentation of P. acnes creating an unfavorable environment for USA300, rather than glycerol weakening the defense system of USA300.


Figure 5. Glycerol fermentation of P. acnes in skin wounds diminishes the colonization of USA300.

P. acnes (107 CFU in 5 µl PBS), P. acnes and glycerol (0.2 mg), PBS (5 µl) alone or glycerol alone were applied onto the skin wounds for 3 days before administration of USA300 (107 CFU in 5 µl PBS) onto the wounded areas. (A, B) Skin lesions pictured 3 days after USA300 application were illustrated. Bar = 0.5 cm. (C) The USA300 numbers in the skin wounds were enumerated 3 days after USA300 application and presented as % of those in skin applied with P. acnes (C) or PBS (D). *P<0.05. P-values were evaluated using two-tailed t-tests. Data are the mean ± SD of lesions from five mice per group. NS: Non-significant.



Mounting evidence demonstrates that human commensal bacteria may be part of human immunity by exhibiting bacterial interference against pathogens [25]. For example, Staphylococcus epidermidis (S. epidermidis), a human commensal bacterium commonly found in the skin, can activate Toll-like receptor 2 (TLR2) signaling and induce antimicrobial peptide expression, thus enabling the skin to mount an enhanced response to pathogens including S. aureus [26]. S. epidermidis in the nasal cavity can secrete serine protease Esp to inhibit biofilm formation and nasal colonization by S. aureus [27]. Here we introduce a novel mechanism by which the skin commensal P. acnes makes use of fermentative processes to hinder the colonization of CA-MRSA in the skin wounds. In mouse skin, P. acnes can ferment glycerol to various SCFAs including propionic acid (Figure 4). Previous studies indicated that SCFAs in skin play a crucial role in influencing the predominant residence of bacteria on normal human skin [18]. It is known that P. acnes and S. epidermidis have higher tolerances to propionic acid than other pathogens [28]. In fact, as shown in Figure 3D, propionic acid (25 mM) exerted excellent antimicrobial activity against USA300, but did not affect the growth of P. acnes (data not shown). Thus, P. acnes fermentation may have a low risk of disrupting the balance of skin microbiome. It has been documented that propionic acid inhibited the various strains (e.g. ATCC29247 [29] and CMCC(B)26003 [30]) of S. aureus besides USA300, suggesting the broad spectrum anti-S. aureus activity of propionic acid.

The identified 13C-labeled SCFAs in Figure 4 were not directly derived from 13C3-glycerol metabolism by mouse skin cells since no 13C-labeled SCFAs were detected in the mice injected with 13C3-glycerol plus PBS. Furthermore, the presence of 13C-labeled propionic acid in the mice injected with 13C3-glycerol plus P. acnes validated that the identified 13C-labeled SCFAs resulted from the P. acnes fermentation. However, the SCFA profile of 13C3-glycerol fermentation by P. acnes in vivo (Figure 4) was not exactly the same as that in vitro (Figure S1). Although propionic acid was measureable in the products of both in vivo and in vitro glycerol fermentation, ethanol, butyric acid and 3-hydroxy-butyric acid were only detected when 13C3-glycerol plus P. acnes were injected into mice. P. acnes HL027PA2 (NCBI Taxon ID 765112) expressed butyryl-CoA dehydrogenase, an enzyme involved in the production of butyric acid during a fermentation process of anaerobic bacteria. A P. acnes strain from health cow rumen fluid had the capability to ferment carbohydrates to butyric acid [31]. Some P. acnes strains were able to produce butyric acid when they were incubated in culture media containing glucose and tributyrin, a triglyceride which can be converted to butyric acid by P. acnes lipase [32]. P. acnes (KPA171202) expressed alcohol dehydrogenase [33], a key enzyme for production of ethanol. Despite the presence of ethanol and butyric acid in mouse skin injected with 13C3-glycerol plus P. acnes in this study, the metabolites of glycerol fermentation of P. acnes in vivo were not well characterized in the literature. We cannot rule out the possibility that host (e.g. pH in skin) affects the in vivo fermentation properties of P. acnes [34].

SCFAs can regulate several leukocyte functions including production of cytokines [(tumor necrosis factor (TNF)-α, interleukins (IL)-2, IL-6 and IL-10]. The ability of leukocytes to migrate to the foci of inflammation and destroy microbial pathogens can be affected by SCFAs [28]. In addition, SCFA and butyric acid, in particular, significantly reduce expression of S. aureus-induced IL-2 and interferon (IFN)-γ [35]. SCFAs have been demonstrated as ligands for free fatty acid receptor 1 (Ffar1) [also called G-protein-coupled receptor 40 (GPR40)] [36]. Previous studies indicated that GW9508 (GlaxoSmithKline), an arylalkyl derivative of the propionic acid, activated the Ffar1 receptor, suppressed chemokine induction in keratinocytes and attenuated cutaneous immune inflammation [37]. Thus, the use of Ffar1 knockout [Ffar1(−/−) mice may be able to determine if Ffar1 is essential for anti-inflammatory action of SCFAs. As shown in Figures 1 and 5, the inhibitory effect of P. acnes on the growth of USA300 was detectable exclusively through glycerol fermentation. Glycerol itself did not influence the growth of P. acnes (Figure S3) and USA300 (data not shown). It was reported that glycerol can be produced endogenously by the breakdown of triglycerides by sebaceous gland-associated lipase in human skin [38]. Bacteria also produce glycerol during fermentation of glucose to ethanol [39]. Aquaporin-3 functions as a glycerol transporter in mammalian skin [40]. It is known that glycerol helps maintain healthy skin integrity [19]. Aquaporin 3-deficient mice exhibit skin defects, including impairment of water holding capacity, barrier recovery, and wound healing [40]. Thus, glycerol naturally produced in skin maybe acts as a bi-functional molecule that serves as a humectant to promote a healthy skin barrier and a fermentation inducer to trigger the probiotic activity of skin commensals. Although propionic acid exerted antimicrobial activity against USA300 in vitro (Figure 3D) and in vivo (Figure 3F), we cannot exclude the possibility that a mixture of SCFAs and/or other secretory proteins [41] or metabolites in glycerol fermentation products of P. acnes also contributed to the anti-USA300 effects of fermented media (Figure 2B and Figure 3C). Propionic acid in lesser amounts may be produced by P. acnes in the TBS culture media in the absence of glycerol since TSB contains dextrose (2.5 g/l), a D-glucose monohydrate, as a carbon source for bacterial growth. The presence of propionic acid and/or other secretory proteins or metabolites may explain a slight suppression of UCA300 growth in vitro by undiluted and glycerol-free media of P. acnes (Figure 2C).

It has been reported that bacteria possess metabolic capabilities to respond to low external pH [42]. This adaptation permits the induction of genes involved in an acid-tolerance response and synthesis of a series of acid shock proteins that are protective for extreme acidic conditions [42]. Mutants defective in AtrB lack an acid tolerance response to propionic acid, indicating that AtrB protein is necessary for the full induction of acid resistance by exposure to propionic acid [43]. Inactivation of PhoP significantly increased bacterial resistance to propionic acid [43]. Recently, S. aureus gene profile expression was investigated in a condition of acidification [44]. Results revealed that the expression of several genes was affected by a variation in pH from 7.5 to 5.5. Among these genes, one can find genes involved in maintaining the intracellular pH, such as the urease operon (ure) and genes encoding intracellular chaperones (clpB). Thus, although our results demonstrate that fermented media of P. acnes decrease the intracellular pH of S. aureus (Figure 2C), the effects of long-term use of skin probiotics containing SCFAs as antimicrobials induces an acid tolerance/resistance response are unknown. Although SCFAs are normal human metabolites and theoretically less toxic, SCFAs at high doses may create an extremely acid solution, which causes skin irritation and/or corrosion [45].

Future work will include developing anti-S. aureus skin probiotics containing live P. acnes, glycerol and/or SCFAs. Even though skin immune cells may block the entrance of P. acnes into bloodstream, it is worth examining if live P. acnes in the anti-S. aureus skin probiotics can enter bloodstream when skin probiotics are applied onto the skin wounds for consecutive days. The application of bacterial-free fermented media or a fermentation inducer (e.g. glycerol) that did not affect the growth of P. acnes (Figure S3) may be a safer approach. A recent study using a multilocus sequence typing scheme (MLST) for P. acnes has suggested that pathogenic versus truly commensal lineages of P. acnes may exist [33], [46]. P. acnes type IA1 strains including ATCC6919 in this study were found predominantly both in healthy skin and acne vulgaris [33]. Several strains of P. acnes were only ever isolated from healthy skin, particularly CC72 (type II) and CC77 (type III) strains, although whether they truly represent commensal lineages still remains to be firmly established. Besides P. acnes, other Propionibacterium species including P. granulosum and P. avidum found in human skin have the capability of utilizing carbohydrates for anaerobic fermentation [47], [48]. Therefore, as far as safety is concerned, the use of skin commensal strains of P. acnes or other Propionibacterium species as anti-S. aureus skin probiotics will be included in future development.

In human healthy skin, an immune response is not generally mounted against commensal P. acnes. Mice can display a robust inflammatory response to P. acnes [49] since P. acnes bacteria do not reside naturally in the mouse skin. Although a mouse wound model recapitulated human S. aureus infection (Figure 5) and the effects of P. acnes-induced inflammatory responses on skin lesions were subtracted from controls, injection of S. aureus with glycerol into an ex vivo human skin explant [50] that harbors commensal P. acnes will be part of future studies. To support our hypothesis that deep-seated abscesses create an anaerobic microenvironment, thus facilitating P. acnes fermentation to interfere with S. aureus, future work will also include collecting various skin biopsies from patients with S. aureus infection. Impetigo, a superficial infection of the skin that bacteria have a chance to expose to oxygen, while cellulitis is a deep-seated infection that invaded bacteria live in an anaerobic microenvironment around the deeper layers (connective tissue) of skin [51]. The abundance of bacteria (P. acnes and S. aureus) and SCFAs including propionic acid in the skin infections of impetigo and cellulitis should be compared. The significance in this study includes 1) validating the effectiveness of P. acnes fermentation as anti-S. aureus skin probiotics; and 2) providing a novel approach to treat S. aureus infections, thereby benefiting the large community of patients with S. aureus/MRSA infections [11]. Microbial fermentation has been widely employed in the development of various products including yogurt, wine, and vinegar. The concept of fermentation of skin commensals against pathogens not only creates potentially a new skin industry but also generates a new area of investigation into the biological function of skin microbiome for promoting human health.

Materials and Methods

Ethics Statement

This study was carried out in strict accordance with the recommendations in the Guide for the Care and Use of Laboratory Animals of the National Institutes of Health (NIH). Experiments of using mice were performed at University of California, San Diego (UCSD). The UCSD ethics committee specifically approved this study under an approved Institutional Animal Care and Use Committee (IACUC) protocol (no. S10058).

Culture of Microorganisms

USA300 or M. luteus (ATCC9341) was cultured on 3% tryptic soy broth (TSB) (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) agar overnight at 37°C. P. acnes (ATCC6919) was cultured on Reinforced Clostridium Medium (RCM, Oxford, Hampshire, England) under anaerobic conditions using Gas-Pak (BD, Sparks, MD, USA) at 37°C. All microorganisms from a single colony were cultured in their media. Overnight cultures were diluted 1∶100 and cultured to an absorbance at 600 nm [optical density (OD)600] = 1.0. Microorganisms were harvested by centrifugation at 5,000 g for 10 min, washed with PBS, and suspended in PBS.

Anti-USA300 Overlay Assay

The P. acnes (105 CFU) or M. luteus was inoculated in two parallel 2-cm streaks on 1.5% agar (Oxoid. Ltd., London, UK) plates containing rich medium [10 g/l yeast extract (Biokar Diagnostics, Beauvais, France), 5 g/l TSB, 2.5 g/l K2HPO4 and 1.5 g/l KH2PO4] in the absence and presence of 20 g/l glycerol under anaerobic conditions using Gas-Pak (BD, Sparks, MD, USA) at 30°C for three days. Soft agar (1%) was cooled to 45°C before USA300 bacteria were added to obtain a concentration of (104 CFU/ml). The soft agar (10 ml) was then poured onto the plates to overlay the rich medium agar. After incubation at 30°C for 40 h under anaerobic conditions, the plates were examined visually.

Probiotic Effects of P. acnes Fermentation Against USA300

P. acnes (105 CFU/ml) was incubated in rich medium (10 ml) in the absence and presence of 20 g/l glycerol under anaerobic conditions using Gas-Pak (BD, Sparks, MD, USA) at 30°C. Rich medium plus 20 g/l glycerol without P. acnes was included as a control. The 0.001% (w/v) phenol red (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA) in rich medium with 20 g/l glycerol served as an indicator, converting from red-orange to yellow when fermentation occurs. To assess the probiotic activity of fermentation products, P. acnes was incubated in phenol red-free rich medium with/without glycerol for seventeen days. After fermentation, P. acnes was discarded by centrifugation at 5,000 g for 30 min. Media were then passed through 0.2-µm-pore-size filters. After filtration, the initial medium or its dilution (1/2 to 1/16) was added to USA300 (105 CFU/ml in TSB) on a 96-well microplate overnight. The plates were mixed well and then OD600 was measured by a microplate reader to estimate bacterial growth.

Measurement of Intracellular pH

Measurement of intracellular pH of USA300 using a cFSE florescence probe (Life Technologies, Grand Island, NY, USA) was previously described [52]. Briefly, USA300 bacteria were loaded with cFSE (5 µM) for 30 min at 37°C in 50 mM HEPES and 5 mM ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid (EDTA). To eliminate unbound probe, bacteria were incubated with glucose (10 mM) for an additional 30 min, washed twice in 50 mM PBS with 10 mM MgCl2, pH 7.0, and then re-suspended in 1 mM PBS. The cFSE-loaded bacteria (3×104 CFU) were dispensed in on a 96-well microplate containing 100 µl/per well of rich medium plus 20 g/l glycerol, or culture supernatants of P. acnes in rich medium in the absence and presence of 20 g/l glycerol. Fluorescence intensities were measured immediately and every min for 5 min using an excitation wavelength of 490 nm and emission wavelength of 520 nm. A drop in relative fluorescence indicates the decrease in intracellular pH. Fluorescence of the bacteria-free filtrate (background fluorescence) was measured after the 5-min assay. In this case, treated suspensions were centrifuged at 5,000 g for 5 min. The fluorescence of the bacteria-free supernatant was measured and deducted from values for the treated suspensions. Calibration curves were obtained by incubation of un-treated, cFSE-loaded bacteria in buffers of various pHs. The buffer containing glycine (50 mM), citric acid (50 mM), Na2HPO4.2H2O (50 mM), and KCl (50 mM) was adjusted to various pH values ranging from 4 to 10. Equilibration of the intracellular and extracellular pH was conducted by addition of 1 µM valinomycin and nigericin (Sigma, St. Louis, MO, USA).

In vivo Effects of Fermented Media and Propionic Acid on Skin Infection of USA300

ICR mice (2–3 month-old females; Harlan Labs, Placentia, CA, USA) were anesthetized by isoflurane. A 5 mm wound was made on the dorsal skin following shaving with electrical clippers. Following skin wounding, we applied 5 µl of media of P. acnes (105 CFU/ml in 10 ml) incubated with/without glycerol or media plus glycerol (control) for 17 days to the wounded areas. To determine if propionic acid can prevent or mitigate the infection of CA-MRSA, 5 µl of 100 mM propionic acid was applied to the wounded areas. Application of PBS (pH 3.5, corresponding to pH for 100 mM propionic acid) or PBS (pH 7.1) to the wounded areas served as controls. The wounds were left uncovered throughout the experimental period. To simulate bacterial infection, USA300 (2×106 CFU in 5 µl PBS) was applied to the wounds 10 min after application of media, propionic acid or PBS controls. To measure the extent of wound closure, a transparent parafilm was placed over the wounded skin and the area was marked by outlining the area of the wound. The lesion size (mm2) was measured daily for 8 days then calculated with ImageJ software (NIH, Bethesda, MD, USA). Five mice per group per experiments were used. We used a Student’s t-test to determine the significance of the differences between groups. Data represent the mean ± SD from three independent experiments. All experiments using mice were conducted in a biosafety level 2 (BSL-2) facility and in accordance with institutional guidelines for animal experiments. To determine the bacterial counts in infected skin, the infected skin was excised 72 h following bacterial application. The excised skin was weighted and homogenized in 200 µl of sterile PBS with a tissue grinder. Bacterial CFUs in the skin were enumerated by plating serial dilutions (1∶101–1∶106) of the homogenate on a TSB agar plate. The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C to count colonies. The bacterial numbers (CFUs) per gram of excised skin were calculated and presented as % of control.

MBC Assays

To determine the MBC of propionic acid, bacteria (106 CFU/ml) were incubated with propionic acid at various concentrations (5–100 mM in PBS) in media on a 96-well microplate (100 µl per well) overnight. The control received only PBS. After incubation, bacteria were diluted 1∶10–1∶106 with PBS. MBC was finally examined at a 99.9% killing level and determined by spotting the dilution (5 µl) on an agar plate supplemented with media for the counting of CFUs.

Validation of P. acnes Glycerol Fermentation in vivo by NMR Analysis

The ear of ICR mice was intradermally injected with 13C3-glycerol (0.2 mg) and P. acnes (ATCC6919; 107 CFU in 10 µl PBS) for one, two or three days. The other ear of the same mouse received 13C3-glycerol (0.2 mg) and PBS (10 µl) as a control. Supernatants (500 µl) of ear homogenates were mixed with 10% D2O for NMR analysis. The 1-D NMR spectra were measured on a JEOL-ECS NMR spectrometer (JEOL USA, Inc., Peabody, MA, USA) operating at resonance frequency of 400 MHz with a repetition delay of 3 sec for 13C NMR. The 2-D 1H-13C heteronuclear single quantum correlation (HSQC) NMR spectra were acquired on a Bruker Avance 600 MHz NMR spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics Inc., Fremont, CA, USA) with a triple resonance inverse (TCI) cryo-probe and recorded as 2048×256 complex points with 32 scans and 1 sec repetition time. Newly appearing signals belong to the intermediates or final products resulting from 13C3-glycerol fermentation by P. acnes [53].

Interference of P. acnes Fermentation with the Colonization of USA300 in vivo

A 5 mm wound made on the dorsal skin of ICR mice were described above. P. acnes (107 CFU in 5 µl PBS), P. acnes and glycerol (0.2 mg), PBS (5 µl) alone or glycerol alone were applied onto the skin wounds for 3 days. USA300 (107 CFU in 5 µl PBS) was administered onto the same wounds. The wounds were excised, weighted and homogenized 3 days after USA300 administration. Bacterial CFUs in the wounds were enumerated by plating serial dilutions (1∶101–1∶106) of the homogenate on a TSB agar plate. The plate was incubated for 24 h at 37°C to count colonies of USA300. After 24 h incubation, only USA300 colonies were formed. It normally takes more than 3 days for P. acnes, a relatively slow-growing bacterium, to form visible colonies on TSB agar plates.

Statistical Analysis

To determine significances between groups, comparisons were made using the two-tailed t-test. For all statistical tests, the P-values of <0.05 (*), <0.01 (**), and <0.001 (***) were accepted for statistical significance.

Supporting Information

Figure S1.

Validation of P. acnes glycerol fermentation via identification of SCFAs in the fermented media by NMR analysis. Fermented media of P. acnes were centrifuged and passed through a 0.2 µm filter. Supernatants were then mixed with 10% D2O and analyzed by NMR spectrometers. Representative 1-D 13C- (A) and 1H- (B) NMR spectra (400 MHz JEOL JNM-ECS) that reveal the principal SCFAs in the fermented media seventeen days after addition of 13C3-glycerol. (C) A 2-D 1H-13C HSQC NMR spectrum (600 MHz) was displayed. In addition to glycerol (Gly), three SCFAs [acetic acid (Ac), lactic acid (L), and propionic acid (P)] were detected in the fermentation products of P. acnes.



Figure S2.

Suppression of USA300-infected lesions by propionic acid. A 5-mm long excision wound will be created on the back of ICR mice. To assess if propionic acid alleviates the lesions caused by USA300 infection, USA300 bacteria (2×106 CFU) were applied onto the wounded areas 10 min after application of propionic acid (5 µl; 100 mM) or PBS (5 µl). (A) Skin lesions were pictured on day 1 after bacterial application. (B) Inflammation (arrows) surrounding the skin lesions (▾) was observed in the H&E-stained frozen sections [low (upper panels) and high (lower panels) powers] of skins applied with USA300 and controls. The scale bars of low power and high power were 40 µm, respectively.



Figure S3.

Comparison of growth curves of P. acnes in the absence of presence of glycerol. P. acnes was incubated in rich medium in the absence (□) and presence (▪) of glycerol on a 96-well microplate under anaerobic conditions at 30°C. The OD600 was read at the indicated time points. Data are the mean ± SD of three separate experiments. Glycerol did not change significantly in the growth of P. acnes.




We thank Dr. Y.T. Liu for providing comments on this manuscript and A. Dai for reading and editing this manuscript.

Author Contributions

Conceived and designed the experiments: CHM. Performed the experiments: MS YW CMH JY SK. Analyzed the data: AC YJ CMH. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: RLG CMH. Wrote the paper: CMH.


  1. 1.
    Ji G, Beavis R, Novick RP (1997) Bacterial interference caused by autoinducing peptide variants. Science 276: 2027–2030.
  2. 2.
    Falagas ME, Rafailidis PI, Makris GC (2008) Bacterial interference for the prevention and treatment of infections. Int J Antimicrob Agents 31: 518–522.
  3. 3.
    Ingram LO, Buttke TM (1984) Effects of alcohols on micro-organisms. Adv Microb Physiol 25: 253–300.
  4. 4.
    Demaerel P, Van Hecke P, Van Oostende S, Baert AL, Jaeken J, et al. (1994) Bacterial metabolism shown by magnetic resonance spectroscopy. Lancet 344: 1234–1235.
  5. 5.
    Grice EA, Segre JA (2011) The skin microbiome. Nat Rev Microbiol 9: 244–253.
  6. 6.
    Ahn CY, Ko CY, Wagar EA, Wong RS, Shaw WW (1996) Microbial evaluation: 139 implants removed from symptomatic patients. Plast Reconstr Surg 98: 1225–1229.
  7. 7.
    Evans CA (1975) Persistent individual differences in the bacterial flora of the skin of the forehead: numbers of propionibacteria. J Invest Dermatol 64: 42–46.
  8. 8.
    Evans CA, Crook JR, Strom MS (1984) The bacterial flora of the forehead and back of Alaskan native villagers in summer and in winter. J Invest Dermatol 82: 294–297.
  9. 9.
    Ramstad S, Futsaether CM, Johnsson A (1997) Porphyrin sensitization and intracellular calcium changes in the prokaryote Propionibacterium acnes. J Photochem Photobiol B 40: 141–148.
  10. 10.
    Malani PN, Rana MM, Banerjee M, Bradley SF (2008) Staphylococcus aureus bloodstream infections: the association between age and mortality and functional status. J Am Geriatr Soc 56: 1485–1489.
  11. 11.
    Goetghebeur M, Landry PA, Han D, Vicente C (2007) Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus: A public health issue with economic consequences. Can J Infect Dis Med Microbiol 18: 27–34.
  12. 12.
    Gilbert M, MacDonald J, Gregson D, Siushansian J, Zhang K, et al. (2006) Outbreak in Alberta of community-acquired (USA300) methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus in people with a history of drug use, homelessness or incarceration. CMAJ 175: 149–154.
  13. 13.
    Kaplan SL, Hulten KG, Gonzalez BE, Hammerman WA, Lamberth L, et al. (2005) Three-year surveillance of community-acquired Staphylococcus aureus infections in children. Clin Infect Dis 40: 1785–1791.
  14. 14.
    Saleh K, Sonesson A, Persson B, Riesbeck K, Schmidtchen A (2011) A descriptive study of bacterial load of full-thickness surgical wounds in dermatologic surgery. Dermatol Surg 37: 1014–1022.
  15. 15.
    Bashir A, Mujahid TY, Jehan N (2007) Antibiotic resistance profile: isolation and characterization of clinical isolates of staphylococci from patients with community-acquired skin infections. Pak J Pharm Sci 20: 299–304.
  16. 16.
    Ramage G, Tunney MM, Patrick S, Gorman SP, Nixon JR (2003) Formation of Propionibacterium acnes biofilms on orthopaedic biomaterials and their susceptibility to antimicrobials. Biomaterials 24: 3221–3227.
  17. 17.
    Higaki S, Nakamura M, Morohashi M, Yamagishi T (2004) Propionibacterium acnes biotypes and susceptibility to minocycline and Keigai-rengyo-to. Int J Dermatol 43: 103–107.
  18. 18.
    Ushijima T, Takahashi M, Ozaki Y (1984) Acetic, propionic, and oleic acid as the possible factors influencing the predominant residence of some species of Propionibacterium and coagulase-negative Staphylococcus on normal human skin. Can J Microbiol 30: 647–652.
  19. 19.
    Fluhr JW, Darlenski R, Surber C (2008) Glycerol and the skin: holistic approach to its origin and functions. Br J Dermatol 159: 23–34.
  20. 20.
    Millet S, Van Oeckel MJ, Aluwe M, Delezie E, De Brabander DL (2010) Prediction of in vivo short-chain fatty acid production in hindgut fermenting mammals: problems and pitfalls. Crit Rev Food Sci Nutr 50: 605–619.
  21. 21.
    Ostling CE, Lindgren SE (1993) Inhibition of enterobacteria and Listeria growth by lactic, acetic and formic acids. J Appl Bacteriol 75: 18–24.
  22. 22.
    Ricke SC (2003) Perspectives on the use of organic acids and short chain fatty acids as antimicrobials. Poult Sci 82: 632–639.
  23. 23.
    Dishisha T, Alvarez MT, Hatti-Kaul R (2012) Batch- and continuous propionic acid production from glycerol using free and immobilized cells of Propionibacterium acidipropionici. Bioresour Technol 118: 553–562.
  24. 24.
    Cohen AL, Shuler C, McAllister S, Fosheim GE, Brown MG, et al. (2007) Methamphetamine use and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus skin infections. Emerg Infect Dis 13: 1707–1713.
  25. 25.
    Gallo RL, Nakatsuji T (2011) Microbial symbiosis with the innate immune defense system of the skin. J Invest Dermatol 131: 1974–1980.
  26. 26.
    Lai Y, Cogen AL, Radek KA, Park HJ, Macleod DT, et al. (2010) Activation of TLR2 by a small molecule produced by Staphylococcus epidermidis increases antimicrobial defense against bacterial skin infections. J Invest Dermatol 130: 2211–2221.
  27. 27.
    Iwase T, Uehara Y, Shinji H, Tajima A, Seo H, et al. (2010) Staphylococcus epidermidis Esp inhibits Staphylococcus aureus biofilm formation and nasal colonization. Nature 465: 346–349.
  28. 28.
    Vinolo MA, Rodrigues HG, Nachbar RT, Curi R (2011) Regulation of inflammation by short chain fatty acids. Nutrients 3: 858–876.
  29. 29.
    Raftari M, Jalilian FA, Abdulamir AS, Son R, Sekawi Z, et al. (2009) Effect of organic acids on Escherichia coli O157:H7 and Staphylococcus aureus contaminated meat. Open Microbiol J 3: 121–127.
  30. 30.
    Zhang H, Shen Y, Weng P, Zhao G, Feng F, et al. Antimicrobial activity of a food-grade fully dilutable microemulsion against Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus. Int J Food Microbiol 135: 211–215.
  31. 31.
    Wu L, Zhao M, Xia C, Ni H, Zhang H (2009) Isolation, identification and rumen fermentation characteristics of Propionibacterium acnes. Wei Sheng Wu Xue Bao 49: 168–173.
  32. 32.
    Higaki S, Hasegawa Y, Morohashi M, Sakamoto K, Yamagishi T (1990) The influence of coptidis rhizoma to lipase activity of Propionibacterium acnes. Nihon Hifuka Gakkai Zasshi 100: 883–886.
  33. 33.
    Lomholt HB, Kilian M (2010) Population genetic analysis of Propionibacterium acnes identifies a subpopulation and epidemic clones associated with acne. PLoS One 5: e12277.
  34. 34.
    Louis P, Scott KP, Duncan SH, Flint HJ (2007) Understanding the effects of diet on bacterial metabolism in the large intestine. J Appl Microbiol 102: 1197–1208.
  35. 35.
    Park JS, Lee EJ, Lee JC, Kim WK, Kim HS (2007) Anti-inflammatory effects of short chain fatty acids in IFN-gamma-stimulated RAW 264.7 murine macrophage cells: involvement of NF-kappaB and ERK signaling pathways. Int Immunopharmacol 7: 70–77.
  36. 36.
    Hara T, Hirasawa A, Ichimura A, Kimura I, Tsujimoto G (2011) Free fatty acid receptors FFAR1 and GPR120 as novel therapeutic targets for metabolic disorders. J Pharm Sci 100: 3594–3601.
  37. 37.
    Fujita T, Matsuoka T, Honda T, Kabashima K, Hirata T, et al. (2011) A GPR40 agonist GW9508 suppresses CCL5, CCL17, and CXCL10 induction in keratinocytes and attenuates cutaneous immune inflammation. J Invest Dermatol 131: 1660–1667.
  38. 38.
    Smith KR, Thiboutot DM (2008) Thematic review series: skin lipids. Sebaceous gland lipids: friend or foe? J Lipid Res 49: 271–281.
  39. 39.
    Wang ZX, Zhuge J, Fang H, Prior BA (2001) Glycerol production by microbial fermentation: a review. Biotechnol Adv 19: 201–223.
  40. 40.
    Zheng X, Bollinger Bollag W (2003) Aquaporin 3 colocates with phospholipase d2 in caveolin-rich membrane microdomains and is downregulated upon keratinocyte differentiation. J Invest Dermatol 121: 1487–1495.
  41. 41.
    Kabongo Muamba ML (1982) Exoenzymes of Propionibacterium acnes. Can J Microbiol 28: 758–761.
  42. 42.
    Slonczewski (1992) pH-regulated genes in enteric bacteria. Am Soc Microbial News 58: 140–144.
  43. 43.
    Kwon YM, Ricke SC (1998) Induction of acid resistance of Salmonella typhimurium by exposure to short-chain fatty acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 64: 3458–3463.
  44. 44.
    Weinrick B, Dunman PM, McAleese F, Murphy E, Projan SJ, et al. (2004) Effect of mild acid on gene expression in Staphylococcus aureus. J Bacteriol 186: 8407–8423.
  45. 45.
    Kidd DA, Johnson M, Clements J (2007) Development of an in vitro corrosion/irritation prediction assay using the EpiDerm skin model. Toxicol In Vitro 21: 1292–1297.
  46. 46.
    McDowell A, Barnard E, Nagy I, Gao A, Tomida S, et al. (2012) An expanded multilocus sequence typing scheme for propionibacterium acnes: investigation of ‘pathogenic’, ‘commensal’ and antibiotic resistant strains. PLoS One 7: e41480.
  47. 47.
    Cummins CS (1976) Identification of Propionibacterium acnes and related organisms by precipitin tests with trichloroacetic acid extracts. J Clin Microbiol 2: 104–110.
  48. 48.
    Cummins CS, Johnson JL (1974) Corynebacterium parvum: a synonym for Propionibacterium acnes? J Gen Microbiol 80: 433–442.
  49. 49.
    Kitagawa H, Yamanaka K, Kakeda M, Inada H, Imai Y, et al. (2011) Propionibacterium acnes vaccination induces regulatory T cells and Th1 immune responses and improves mouse atopic dermatitis. Exp Dermatol 20: 157–158.
  50. 50.
    Curry JL, Qin JZ, Robinson J, Nickoloff BJ (2003) Reactivity of resident immunocytes in normal and prepsoriatic skin using an ex vivo skin-explant model system. Arch Pathol Lab Med 127: 289–296.
  51. 51.
    Odell CA (2010) Community-associated methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (CA-MRSA) skin infections. Curr Opin Pediatr 22: 273–277.
  52. 52.
    Chitarra LG, Breeuwer P, Van Den Bulk RW, Abee T (2000) Rapid fluorescence assessment of intracellular pH as a viability indicator of Clavibacter michiganensis subsp. michiganensis. J Appl Microbiol 88: 809–816.
  53. 53.
    Lind H, Broberg A, Jacobsson K, Jonsson H, Schnurer J (2010) Glycerol enhances the antifungal activity of dairy propionibacteria. Int J Microbiol 2010: 430873.
Rate this post