Probiotic effect of Pichia pastoris X-33 produced in parboiled rice effluent and YPD medium on broiler chickens


In a previous paper we showed that the yeast Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with glycerol byproduct from the biodiesel industry improved the quality of the effluent. In this paper we show the validation of this yeast (PPE) as probiotic for broilers. Its effect on feed efficiency and immunomodulation was compared with the same yeast grown in yeast peptone dextrose medium (PPY), with Saccharomyces boulardii (SBY) and with the controls fed unsupplemented feed (CON). One-day-old female chicks were vaccinated against infectious bursal disease (IBD) and the titers of anti-IBD antibodies were measured by ELISA. PPE group had the highest mean titres on days 14 and 28 (p<0,05), and at 28 days, 64% of the animals showed seroconvertion. The PPE group also showed the best weight gains at 42 days of age, that, on days 7, 14 and 21 were 19%, 15%, and 8.7% higher, respectively, than the control group. The best feed conversion, 8.2% higher than the control group, was obtained by PPY at 42 days. Histopathological studies did not detect any undesirable effects in the supplemented animals. We concluded that Pichia pastoris X-33 when grown in effluents of the rice parboiling industry supplemented with glycerol byproduct from the biodiesel has probiotic properties for poultry.


At the beginning of the century the European Community banned the use of antibiotics as growth promoters or for disease control in animal feeds [1, 2], challenging the broiler industry all around the world to find substitutes for them. Prebiotics, probiotics and symbiotics appeared as alternatives. Several yeasts exhibited prebiotic or probiotic properties improving feed efficiency and enhancing immunity [38].

With a world production of 88.7 million tons in 2016, chicken meat is the second highest commodity on the world´s meat production market, being Brazil the world’s biggest exporter and the second larger producer [9, 10]. In 2014 the global market for animal feed reached one thousand million tons, 44% of which were for poultry [11].

Residual by-products from agriculture, forestry and the food industry are used as culture media for the industrial production of yeast probiotics [12, 13]. Strains of the genus Pichia were grown in waste products of the fermented kimchi industry [14], in an aqueous by-product of the fermentation of lettuce [15], in the residue of cabbage fermentation [16], in waste water from potato chips [17], in a by-product of the biodiesel industry that predominantly contains glycerol [18] and in the effluent of the parboiled rice industry supplemented with a byproduct of the biodiesel industry [19]. Pichia sp. NRRL Y-4810 associated with other microorganisms obtained from the residue of the fermentation of black tea [20] and Pichia guilliermondii® marketed by CitriStim [21] have also demonstrated probiotic effects. So far the probiotic properties of P. pastoris grown in effluents of the rice parboiled industry were not studied.

Our group showed that P. pastoris KM71H has probiotic properties and improves the feed efficiency of broiler chickens [4]. Another study demonstrated that, when grown in an effluent of the parboiled rice industry supplemented with a by-product of the biodiesel industry containing mainly glycerol, P. pastoris X-33 reduced the effluent’s chemical oxygen demand (COD), nitrogen (N, Kjeldahl Total Nitrogen) and phosphorus contents [19], demonstrating its potential for bioremediation. Furthermore, P. pastoris X-33 has also demonstrated antibacterial activity against Salmonella Typhimurium [22].

In this paper we show the validation of P. pastoris X-33 grown in an effluent of the parboiling rice industry supplemented with a byproduct of the biodiesel industry as probiotic for broiler chickens in terms of safety, effect on feed efficiency and immunomodulation.

Materials and methods

All the experiments performed in this study were approved by the Federal University of Pelotas Animal Care Committee in accordance with Brazilian Federal Laws. All the procedures used were approved by the Ethics Committee on Animal Experimentation of the Federal University of Pelotas (process N° 23110.008532/2011-12).

Animals and housing conditions

One hundred and twenty female one-day-old Cobb 500 chicks purchased from a commercial hatchery (Cooperativa Sul-Rio-Grandense de Laticínios Ltda., Morro Redondo, RS, Brazil) were vaccinated against Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD, Gumboro) and Marek’s disease (VECTORMUNE® HVT-IBD, Ceva Saúde Animal Ltda., Paulínia, SP, Brazil). The animals were randomly divided into four groups (30 per group) and housed in 10 m2 boxes with concrete floor covered with 10 cm of wood shavings. The animals received the same commercial food free of antibacterials (Supra Profrango, Alisul Ltda.) throughout the experiment and water ad libitum. The yeasts were added in liquid state to commercial food using a Y industry mixer to guarantee the homogeneity of the feed.


The control group (CON) was fed with non-supplemented feed; SBY group received feed supplemented with 1×107 CFU g-1 of Saccharomyces boulardii (Floratil®, Merck) grown in Yeast Peptone Dextrose medium (YPD, Difco, USA); PPE group was fed with feed supplemented with 1×107 CFU g-1 of P. pastoris X-33 (Invitrogen®, USA) grown in an effluent from the tanks of parboiling rice industry to which 15 g.L-1 of glycerol by-product from the biodiesel industry was added [19], and PPY group with feed supplemented with 1×107 CFU g-1 of P. pastoris X-33 grown in YPD.

Production of yeasts

The yeasts were grown at 28°C, 400 rpm and 1 vvm of sterile air for 24 hours in a New Brunswick 110 bioreactor (New Brunswick Scientific, NJ, USA) in volumes of 7 L of medium and 10% of inoculums. Pre-inoculums and inoculums were grown on an orbital shaker at 150 rpm and 28°C for 12 h, using YPD (Difco, USA) for those of SBY and PPY groups, and YM (Yeast Medium, Difco, USA) for PPE. 1M NaOH was used to adjust the pH of the medium in PPE to 5.5 at the beginning of the process. Two mL of antifoam Agripec 263 EA was diluted at a ratio of 1:5 in water and added to all the fermentations at the start of the experiment.

Feed Convertion Ratio (FCR)

Each animal was weighed on days 1, 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 of the experiment. Weight gains were evaluated at 7, 14, 21, 28, 35 and 42 days by subtracting the weight of the animal at day one from that on the respective day. Feed conversions were estimated by dividing the weight gain of the group in the period assessed by the amount of feed consumed during the period. When deaths occurred, feed intake per animal was calculated, and the estimation of food intake corrected to the number of survivors of the respective group.

Histology methodology

Tissue fragments of liver, spleen and intestines were fixed into formalin, dehydrated in increasing concentrations of ethanol and subsequently embedded in paraffin. Sections (3–5 μm thick) were cut using a rotary microtome (Leica RM 2255), mounted on glass slides and stained with hematoxylin and eosin. Histological examinations were performed using a light microscope (Nikon Eclipse 50-i).

Titration of anti-IBD antibodies

Individual blood samples were collected from the wing vein of the animals on days 1, 14, 28 and 42 of the experiment, maintained at 37°C for 15 min and then at 4°C overnight. After centrifugation at 1800 g the serum was collected and stored at -20°C. Titration of anti-IBD antibodies by ELISA was performed by Mercolab Laboratory (Garibaldi, RS, Brazil) using IDEXX IBD Ab Test (Idexx Laboratories, Inc., Maine, USA) in accordance with the manufacturer’s instructions.


On day 42 of the experiment, ten animals from each group were euthanized (cervical dislocation) and necropsied for macroscopic evaluations of the liver, spleen, heart, bursa of Fabricius, proventriculus, small and large intestines. Sections of liver, spleen and intestines were stained with hematoxylin-eosin and evaluated by microscopy.

Statistical analysis

ANOVA proc glm (general linear model of SAS) was used to analyze the data. Differences between the means were evaluated by the Duncan test (p<0.05) and the normality tested by Shapiro-Wilk.


Feed efficiency

On the first day of the experiment there were no differences in the average weights between the groups. The supplemented groups SBY, PPE and PPY, had higher average weights throughout the experiment, with the exception of the weights at 35 days, when P. pastoris YPD had the lower value (Table 1). On days 7 and 14, the supplemented groups had significantly higher weights (p<0.05) than the control group. The effluent group (PPE) exhibited the highest average weights throughout the experiment (p<0.05).

On day 7 the P. pastoris groups (PPE and PPY) had significantly higher weight gains (p<0.05) while that of the S. boulardii group was higher than the controls (p<0.05). On day 14 there were no differences among the weight gain of the supplemented groups (p>0.05), although the weight gain of the control group was significantly lower (p<0.05). On day 21, only the animals in the effluent group (PPE) had significantly higher weight gains than those of the control group (Table 1).

Until day 21 the lower feed conversion was obtained by the S. boulardii group (SBY) (Table 1). On day 28, feed conversion of the S. boulardii (SBY) and P. pastori YPD (PPY) were not different (p<0.05). From the 28th day until the end of the experiment the best feed conversion was obtained by the P. pastoris YPD group (Table 1).

Anti-IBD titers

On day one all the chicks showed high titers (2500) of maternal antibodies against Infectious Bursal Disease. The titers fell steadily until day 28, with lower percentage of the chicks with titers above 1000 in the CON and SBY groups. After day 28 the titers of the animals in the four groups increased steadily surpassing that threshold (Table 2, Fig 1).


Fig 1. Mean titers of anti-IBD antibodies by ELISA.

CON: Control; SBY: S. boulardii; PPE: P. pastoris effluent; PPY: P. pastoris YPD. Different letters signify the mean statistical differences on the day (p<0.05).


No significant macroscopic changes in liver, spleen, heart, bursa of Fabricius, proventriculus, small and large intestine were found in samples collected from the groups. In the groups with higher weight gains no signs of degenerative or inflammatory lesions were found in the organs evaluated by histopathology (Figs 2 and 3).


Pichia pastoris is a yeast widely used as vector for the expression of heterologous proteins. Although information about its utilization for other purposes is scarce, Gil de los Santos et al. [4] showed that it enhances weight gains in broiler chickens. In a previous paper [19] our group showed that P. pastoris X-33 grown in parboiled rice effluent supplemented with glycerol of the biodiesel industry, two industrial wastes without commercial value was able to reduce 38.8% of COD (Chemical Oxygen Demand), 75% NTK—N and 90% P in the effluents of the parboiled rice industry. This paper reports for the first time the probiotic properties in broilers of this yeast grown in the effluents of that industry.

Among the great variety of microorganisms used as probiotics, yeasts are of special interest due to their capacity to grow in low-cost media and even in residues or effluents that constitute environmental hazards, and for its capacity to survive in the conditions of animal breeding premises and incorporated to animal feed. Research has extensively shown a great variation in the results obtained, even with the same probiotic and the same animal species, demonstrating that different experimental conditions may affect how yeasts behave as probiotics. In the experiment here reported the properties of P. pastoris X-33 grown in an effluent of the parboiled rice industry supplemented with biodiesel glycerol were compared in identical experimental conditions with other probiotics produced by our group.

Our results showed that during the first three weeks body weight gains were higher in the supplemented groups, although those supplemented with S. boulardii and P. pastoris grown in YPD were not significantly higher than the controls. Salim et al. [23] demonstrated that a mixture of microorganisms containing Saccharomyces cerevisiae increased the body weight gains of broiler chickens at 21 days of age while Bai et al. [24] also reported that it improved feed efficiency in animals fed during the first 21 days of life, although there were no significant differences between supplemented and non-supplemented animals after that period. Aluwong et al. [25] found that probiotics reestablished the conditions of eubiosis in the digestive tract during the first three weeks and that they could increase feed efficiency after that period.

Our results at slaughter (42 days) showed that, although there were no statistical differences between the treatments, weight gains in the groups that received P. pastoris grown in effluent (PPE), P. pastoris grown in YPD (PPY) and S. boulardii (SBY) were higher than the control (0.9%, 0.2%, and 0.1%, respectively). These results are below the differences of 8% obtained with S. boulardii [3], 5.7% with Clostridium butyricum and 2.8% with Enterococcus faecium [26]. These differences may be due to the conditions of the experiments, generally performed in controlled environments. Several researchers on probiotics agree that the real effects of probiotics are shown under field conditions where the probiotics produce significant differences in the parameters evaluated. In terms of feed conversions at 42 days, our results showed that animals supplemented with P. pastoris grown in YPD (PPY) consumed 8.47% less feed than the control group to achieve the same live weight. Similar results were found by Gil de los Santos et al. [4] in broiler chickens fed with P. pastoris KM71H, which consumed 6.6% less feed than the controls, and Mookiah et al. [27] in broiler chickens fed a multistrain Lactobacillus probiotic, which consumed 6.8% less feed than the nonsupplemented group.

Another important property of probiotics is their capacity to modulate immune responses. Some experiments showed that probiotics have immunomodulatory effects depending on the characteristics of the immunogen [2830] and the adjuvant used in the vaccines [31]. The effect of probiotics on the enhancement of the titers of specific and natural antibodies in the serum and gut of chickens against the tetanus toxin was already reported [32, 33]. Gil de los Santos et al. [4] demonstrated that P. pastoris KM71H and its recombinant construct containing the gene of the alpha toxin of Clostridium perfringens increased seroconversion against alpha toxin of Clostridium perfringens in supplemented animals.

Infectious Bursal Disease (IBD) is one of the more economically significant diseases that affect commercially produced chickens worldwide [34]. For this reason, in this study we monitored the dynamics of the immune response elicited in broilers supplemented with our probiotics by an extensively used IBD vaccine in Brazil. The control of this disease in broilers is based on the passive immunity conferred by maternal yolk antibodies [35] followed by active immunity induced by several types of vaccines administered on the first day of age or later. In our experiment we detected decreasing titers of IBD antibodies in the control (CON), S. boulardii (SBY) and P. pastoris (PPY) grown in YPD groups (Fig 1) during the period of passive immunity. Knoblich et al. [36] reported a similar observation with the extinction of IBD detectable antibodies by ELISA 28 days after vaccination in chicks vaccinated at one day of age against a bivalent IBD-Marek’s disease vaccine. In our experiment, only 3% of the chicks in the control group showed antibodies against IBD four weeks after vaccination, whereas on the same date, 64% of those of the P. pastoris effluent group (PPE) had antibodies with a mean titre of 913, showing also the highest percentages of immune animals at 14 and 28 days of age (Fig 1), suggesting that the probiotic has an immunomodulatory effect, maintaining a high level of maternal immunity during the period in which the active immunization induced by the vaccine is being established. At 42 days, the mean titer of the P. pastoris effluent group (PPE) (1842) was significantly lower than those detected in the control (2831), P. pastoris YPD (2448), and S. boulardii (2340) groups, suggesting that the higher antibody titers present in previous periods could have interfered in the vaccinal virus replication, resulting in a reduction in the final mean titer of this group, similar to that observed in other species when active immunization is initiated during the period of passive maternal immunity. Even so, the titers were compatible with adequate immunity.

The P. pastoris effluent group (PPE) maintained the higher titre of antibodies until 35 days of age, in contrast with the lower titers observed in the other groups on days 14 and 28. Although the study of the cause of these observations was without the objective of our experiment, it could be argued that this effect could be due to the differences in protein expression by this yeast due to pH and medium composition that, as has been already shown, could modify the composition of the yeast’s cell membrane and, thus, its interaction with intestinal cells [37]. Recent studies used molecular dynamics simulations suggest that components of medium could induce beneficial interaction between the probiotic and target cells [38]. Choi and Park [14] demonstrated that the composition of proteins and lipids of Pichia guilliermondii A9 differed when it was grown in a residue of the fermentation of kimchi or in yeast medium. Deepika et al. [39] also showed that the temperature of growth and pH of the medium influenced surface composition, hydrophobicity, and the adhesion of Lactobacillus rhamnosus to Caco-2 cells.

The administration of different probiotics from the second day of life onwards could have produced modifications in the gut’s microbiota and the expression of different genes [40]. The higher weight gain obtained by the group supplemented with P. pastoris grown in the effluent medium (PPE) could also have favored the maturation of the immune system improving seroconversions. The maturation of the immune system in chickens begins between the 2nd and 4th day of life and is directly correlated with intestinal microbiota alterations until the 19th day [41].

Our results showed that P. pastoris X-33 grown in an effluent from the parboiled rice industry supplemented with glycerol byproduct from the biodiesel production process had beneficial immunomodulatory effects in broiler chickens. The group supplemented with this yeast had the higher percentage of animals with high titers of anti-IBD antibodies during the critical passive immunity period and the beginning of the active immunity period, when compared with the control group or those supplemented with the other two probiotics tested.

Previous work done by our group [19] showed that Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in effluents of the parboiled rice industry supplemented with glycerol of biodiesel reduces the environmental impacts of the effluent. Furthermore, according to our results, the yeast has probiotic properties that could be used in the breeding of broiler chickens, adding value to effluents.

As far as we know no other experiments of validation of the probiotic properties for poultry of P. pastoris that eliminated pollutants from effluents of the rice parboiling industry have been published, making comparisons impossible.

We concluded that Pichia pastoris X-33 grown in the effluent of the parboiled rice industry supplemented with biodiesel glycerol can be used as a probiotic for broiler chickens, improving the response to IBD vaccines and, when grown in YPD, increasing feed efficiency.


We acknowledge Mercolab Laboratories (Caxias do Sul, RS, Brazil) for performing the ELISA, to CNPq (grant 476140/2012-9), CAPES and FAPERGS for scholarships and IFSUL for laboratory analyses support.

This paper is a partial requirement of the senior author for obtaining a D.Sc. degree from the Universidade Federal de Pelotas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.


  1. 1.
    Council of European Union. Regulation (Ec) no 1831/2003 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 September 2003 on additives for use in animal nutrition.Avaliable: Accessed August 10, 2017.
  2. 2.
    Ohimain EI, Ofongo RTS. The effect of probiotic and probiotic feed supplementation on chicken health and gut microflora: a review. J Anim Vet Adv. 2012; 4(2):135–143.
  3. 3.
    Gil de los Santos JR, Storch OB, Gil-Turnes C. Bacillus cereus var. toyoii and Saccharomyces boulardii increased feed efficiency in broilers infected with Salmonella enteritidis. Br Poult Sci. 2005; 46 (4):494–497. pmid:16268108
  4. 4.
    Gil de los Santos JR, Storch OB, Fernandes CG, Gil-Turnes C. Evaluation in broilers of the probiotic properties of Pichia pastoris and a recombinant P. pastoris containing the Clostridium perfringens alpha toxin gene. Vet Microbiol. 2012; 156:448–451. pmid:22176763
  5. 5.
    Janardhana V, Broadway MM, Bruce MP, Lowenthal JW, Geier MS, Hughes RJ, et al. Prebiotics modulate immune responses in the gut-associated lymphoid tissue of chickens. J Nutr. 2009; 139(7):1404–9. pmid:19474157
  6. 6.
    Kim GB, Seo YM, Kim CH, Paik IK. Effect of dietary prebiotic supplementation on the performance, intestinal microflora, and immune response of broilers. Poult Sci. 2011; 90:75–82. pmid:21177446
  7. 7.
    Rodríguez-Lecompte JC, Yitbarek A, Brady J, Sharif S, Cavanagh MD, Crow G, et al. The effect of microbial-nutrient interaction on the immune system of young chicks after early probiotic and organic acid administration. J Anim Sci. 2012; 90(7):2246–54. pmid:22247115
  8. 8.
    Taklimi SMSM, Lotfollahian H, Shahne AZ, Mirzaei F, Alinejad A. Study on efficacy of probiotic in broiler chickens diet. Agric Sci. 2012; 3(1):5–8.
  9. 9.
    BAAP—Brazilian Association of Animal Protein. Annual Report 2017. Available: Accessed August 10, 2017.
  10. 10.
    USDA—United States Department of Agriculture, Foreign Agricultural Service; Livestock and Poultry: World Markets and Trade, April, 2017. Available: Accessed: August 10, 2017.
  11. 11.
    Alltech. Alltech Global Feed Survey 2016. Avaliable: August 10, 2017.
  12. 12.
    Bekatorou A, Psarianos C, Koutinas AA. Production of food grade yeasts. Food Technol Biotechnol. 2006; 44 (3):407–415
  13. 13.
    Hahn-Hägerdal B, Karhumaa K, Larsson CU, Gorwa-Grauslund M, Gorgens J, van Zyl WH. Role of cultivation media in the development of yeast strains for large scale industrial use. Microb Cell Fact. 2005; 4(31). pmid:16283927
  14. 14.
    Choi MH, Park YH. Growth of Pichia guilliermondii A9, an osmotolerant yeast, in waste brine generated from kimchi production. Bioresour Technol. 1999; 70:231–236
  15. 15.
    Suntornsuk W. Yeast cultivation in lettuce brine. World J Microb Biotechnol. 2000; 16:815–818.
  16. 16.
    Choi MH, Park YH. Production of yeast biomass using waste Chinese cabbage. Biomass and Bioener. 2003; 25:221–226.
  17. 17.
    Gélinas P, Barrette J. Protein enrichment of potato processing waste through yeast fermentation. Bioresour Technol. 2007; 98:1138–1143. pmid:16782332
  18. 18.
    Çelik E, Ozbay N, Oktar N, Çalık P. Use of Biodiesel Byproduct Crude Glycerol as the Carbon Source for Fermentation Processes by Recombinant Pichia pastoris. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2008; 47:2985–2990
  19. 19.
    Gil de los Santos D, Gil-Turnes C, Conceição F.R. Bioremediation of parboiled rice effluent supplemented with biodiesel-derived glycerol using Pichia pastoris X-33. Scient World J. 2012; 2012: 492925. pmid:22919327
  20. 20.
    Murugesan GS, Sathishkumar M, Swaminathan K. Supplementation of waste tea fungal biomass as a dietary ingredient for broiler chicks. Bioresour Technol. 2005; 96:1743–1748. pmid:16051080
  21. 21.
    Shanmugasundaram R, Selvaraj RK. Effect of killed whole yeast cell prebiotic supplementation on broiler performance and intestinal immune cell parameters. Poult Sci. 2012; 91:107–111. pmid:22184435
  22. 22.
    França RC, Conceição FR, , Haubert L, Sabadin G, de Oliveira PD, et al. Pichia pastoris X-33 has probiotic properties with remarkable antibacterial activity against Salmonella Typhimurium. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2015; 99(19):7953–61. pmid:26088173
  23. 23.
    Salim HM, Kang HK, Akter N, Kim DW, Kim JH, Kim MJ, et al. Supplementation of direct-fed microbials as an alternative to antibiotic on growth performance, immune response, cecal microbial population, and ileal morphology of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2013; 92(8):2084–90. pmid:23873556
  24. 24.
    Bai SP, Wu AM, Ding XM, Lei Y, Bai J, Zhang KY, et al. Effects of probiotic-supplemented diets on growth performance and intestinal immune characteristics of broiler chickens. Poult Sci. 2013; 92(3):663–670. pmid:23436517
  25. 25.
    Aluwong T, Hassan F, Dzenda T, Kawu M, Ayo J. Effect of different levels of supplemental yeast on body weight, thyroid hormone metabolism and lipid profile of broiler chickens. J Vet Med Sci. 2013; 75(3):291–298 pmid:23100117
  26. 26.
    Zhao X, Guo Y, Guo S, Tan J. Effects of Clostridium butyricum and Enterococcus faecium on growth performance, lipid metabolism, and cecal microbiota of broiler chickens. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol. 2013; 97(14):6477–88. Epub 2013May 12. pmid:23666481
  27. 27.
    Mookiah S, Sieo CC, Ramasamy K, Abdullah N, Ho YW. Effects of dietary prebiotics, probiotic and synbiotics on performance, caecal bacterial populations and caecal fermentation concentrations of broiler chickens. J Sci Food Agric. 2014; 30; 94(2):341–8. pmid:24037967
  28. 28.
    Conceição FR, Zani JL, Gil-Turnes C. Effect of probiotic Cenbiot on the humoral response to an Escherichia coli bacterin. Food and Agric Immunol. 2002; 14:133–138
  29. 29.
    Copolla MM, Conceição FR, Gil-Turnes C. Effect of Saccharomyces boulardii and Bacillus cereus var toyoi on the humoral and cellular response of mice to vaccines. Food and Agric Immunol. 2005; 16(3):213–219.
  30. 30.
    Roos TB, Tabeleão VC, Dummer LA, Schwegler E, Goulart MA, Moura SV, et al. Effect of Bacillus cereus var. toyoi and Saccharomyces boulardii on the immune response of sheep to vaccines. Food Agric Immunol. 2010; 21(2):113–118.
  31. 31.
    Roos TB, Lara APSS, Dummer LA, Fischer G, Leivas Leite FP. The immune modulation of Bacillus cereus var. Toyoi in mice immunized with experimental inactivated Bovine Herpesvirus Type 5 vaccine. Vaccine 2012; 30:2173–2177. pmid:22285271
  32. 32.
    Haghighi HR, Gong J, Gyles CL, Hayes MA, Sanei B, Parvizi P, et al. Modulation of antibody-mediated immune response by probiotics in chickens. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2005; 12(12):1387–1392. pmid:16339061
  33. 33.
    Haghighi HR, Gong J, Gyles CL, Hayes MA, Zhou H, Sanei B, et al. Probiotics stimulate production of natural antibodies in chickens. Clin and Vaccine Immunol. 2006; 13(9):975–980. pmid:16960107
  34. 34.
    Müller H, Mundt E, Eterradossi N, Islam MR. Current status of vaccines against infectious bursal disease. Avian Pathol. 2012; 41(2):133–9. pmid:22515532
  35. 35.
    Hamal KR, Burgess SC, Pevzner IY, Erf GF. Maternal antibody transfer from dams to their egg yolks, egg whites, and chicks in meat lines of chickens. Poult Sci. 2006; 85:1364–1372 pmid:16903465
  36. 36.
    Knoblich HV, Sommer SE, Jackwood DJ. Antibody titers to infectious bursal disease virus in broiler chicks after vaccination at one day of age with infectious bursal disease virus and Marek’s disease virus. Avian Dis. 2000; 44(4):874–884 pmid:11195642
  37. 37.
    Li P, Anumanthan A, Gao X, Ilangovan K, Suzara VV, Düzgüneş N, et al. Expression of recombinant proteins in Pichia Pastoris. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2007; 142:105–124. pmid:18025573
  38. 38.
    Yadav R, Singh PK, Puniya AK, Shukla P Catalytic interactions and molecular docking of bile salt hydrolase (BSH) from L. plantarum RYPR1 and its prebiotic utilization. Front. Microbiol. 2017; 7:2116. pmid:28111569
  39. 39.
    Deepika G, Karunakaran E, Hurley CR, Biggs CA, Charalampopoulos D. Influence of fermentation conditions on the surface properties and adhesion of Lactobacillus rhamnosus GG. Microb Cell Fact. 2012; 11:116. pmid:22931558
  40. 40.
    Yeshi Y, Fang L, Liying Z, Sujuan L, Zuowei W, Ruifen Z et al. Exposure of different bacterial inocula to newborn chicken affects gut microbiota development and ileum gene expression. ISME J. 2010; 4:367–376. pmid:19956274
  41. 41.
    Crhanova M, Hradecka H, Faldynova M, Matulova M, Havlickova H, Sisak F, et al. Immune response of chicken gut to natural colonization by gut microflora and to Salmonella enterica serovar Enteritidis infection. Infect Immun. 2001; 79(7):2755–2763
Rate this post